Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6674 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.208/2022
Surajmal Jat S/o Shri Sonaram Jat
----Petitioner
Versus
Ajay Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Sunderlal Yadav & Ors.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Narain Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 14/10/2022
Learned counsel for petitioner-defendant No.3 submits that
respondent-plaintiff himself has admitted in the plaint that he is not in
possession of the suit property but the suit property is in possession of
defendants, yet he has filed a suit for declaration and permanent
injunction only, which is not maintainable by virtue of Section 34 of the
Specific Relief Act, 1963 unless and until plaintiff also does not sue for
obtaining the possession.
Reliance has been placed on the judgment passed by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in case of Union of India vs. Ibrahim Uddin & Anr.
[(2012) 8 SCC 148].
Heard.
Admit.
Issue notice to respondents.
It has been informed that petitioner-defendant No.3 is yet to file
written statement.
Without staying the further proceedings, it is hereby observed
that the petitioner may file his written statement and the trial court may
proceed to frame the issues but shall not initiate the trial thereafter.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J SAURABH/14
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!