Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jakir Hussain vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 12353 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12353 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Jakir Hussain vs State Of Rajasthan on 17 October, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
           S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1113/2022

Jakir Hussain S/o Khaju Khan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Sanjay
Basti, Naya Talab, Nagori Gate, Jodhpur (Raj.) (At Present
Lodged At Central Jail, Jodhpur)
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.       Naresh Kumar S/o Shankar Lal, B/c Sargara, R/o Sargara
         Colony, Ship House, Gali No. 2, Nagori Gate, Jodhpur.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Gokulesh Bohra.
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP.



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                      Order

17/10/2022



     Admit.

     Issue notice to the respondent No.1 only, as the learned

Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2-

State.

     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Public Prosecutor on S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Revision)

No.366/2022.

     For    the     reasons      mentioned           in    the    application   (IA

No.01/2022) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the delay

is condoned.

     Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

is in custody since 23.08.2022.

                      (Downloaded on 18/10/2022 at 09:12:41 PM)
                                            (2 of 3)                       [CRLR-1113/2022]


       Learned      Public    Prosecutor        opposes         the      suspension     of

sentence application.

       I have considered the rival arguments advanced by the

parties and perused the judgments of the courts below.

       Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the

short sentence awarded by the learned trial court, this Court

deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the

accused petitioner.

       Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Revision)

No.366/2022 filed under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. is allowed and it

is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Additional

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate No.3, Jodhpur Metro in Criminal

Case    No.69/2013           NCV     No.35637/2014              vide       order    dated

07.08.2018 as affirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge

No.5, Jodhpur Metro vide order dated 29.066.2019 in Criminal

Appeal No.385/2018 (NCV No.385/2018) against the petitioner

Jakir Hussain S/o Khaju Khan shall remain suspended till final

disposal of the aforesaid revision and he shall be released on bail,

provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-

with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned     trial   Judge     for    his    appearance              in   this   Court   on

18.11.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of

the revision on the conditions indicated below:-

       1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the

             month of January of every year till the revision is

             decided.

       2.    That if the petitioner changes the place of

             residence, he will give in writing his changed

                        (Downloaded on 18/10/2022 at 09:12:41 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLR-1113/2022]


                                                 address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

                                                 in the High Court.

                                         3.      Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

                                                 they will give in writing their changed address to

                                                 the trial Court.

                                         The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-petitioner in a separate file. Such file be registered as

                                   Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

                                   petitioner was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

                                   be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused-petitioner does not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.


                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

125-/Jitender//-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter