Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Swami Gangadas Shiksha Samiti vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 13511 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13511 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 November, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Swami Gangadas Shiksha Samiti vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 November, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17348/2022

Swami Gangadas Shiksha Samiti, Balesar, Post Naurangpura,
Tehsil Virat Nagar, District Jaipur (Raj.), Through Its Secretary Of
Shri Kalyan Sahay Sharma Son Of Late Shri Ladu Ram Joshi,
Aged About 77 Years, Resident Of Balesar, Post Naurangpura,
Tehsil Virat Nagar, District Jaipur (Rajasthan).
                                                        ----Petitioner
                                Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director, Animal
        Husbandry Department, Jaipur.
2.      Deputy Secretary To The Government, Department Of
        Animal Husbandry, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.      Rajasthan University Of Veterinary And Animal Sciences
        Bikaner, Through Its Registrar.
                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)             :     Mr. Om Prakash Sharma



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                         Order

18/11/2022

     Counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy

involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by

the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Professor S

Karan Shiksha Samiti Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

(S.B.Civil     Writ       Petition         No.24692/2018                decided     on

09.04.2019).

     Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue

involved in this writ petition is no more res-integra in view of the

adjudication by a Constitution Bench of the Apex Court of the land

in the case of Islamic Academy of Education Versus State of

Karnataka: 2003 (6) SCC 679, which reads thus:


     "25.    Privately    managed       educational      institutions   imparting
     professional education in the fields of(33)medicine, dentistry and

                         (Downloaded on 22/11/2022 at 08:55:14 PM)
                                                                                (2 of 2)                      [CW-17348/2022]

                                         engineering have spurted in the last few decades. The right of the
                                         minorities to establish an institution of their own choice in terms of
                                         clause(1) of Article 30 of the Constitution of India is recognized; so
                                         is the right of a citizen who intends to establish an institution under
                                         Article 19 (1) (g) thereof. However, the fundamental right of a
                                         citizen to establish an educational institution and in particular a
                                         professional institution is not absolute. These rights are subject to
                                         regulations and laws imposing reasonable restrictions. Such
                                         reasonable restriction in public interest can be imposed under
                                         Clause (6) of Article 19 and regulations under Article 30 of the
                                         Constitution of India. The right to establish an educational
                                         institution, although guaranteed under the Constitution, recognition
                                         of affiliation is not. Recognition or affiliation of professional
                                         institution must be in terms of statute."



                                         Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will file

                                   the detail representation before the respondents within a period of

                                   fifteen days from today and the respondents may be directed to

                                   consider his representation in the light of the judgment passed by

                                   the Co-ordinate Bench at Jaipur in case of Professor S Karan

                                   Shiksha Samiti Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ

                                   Petition No.24692/2018 decided on 09.04.2019). In view of

                                   submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner, respondent is

                                   directed      to   decide   the     representation           of     the   petitioner   in

                                   accordance with law preferably within a period of two months from

                                   the date of receiving representation alongwith certified copy of

                                   this order.

                                         The writ petition as well as stay petition is disposed of.



                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

341-Sanjay/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter