Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nanak Ram vs Bhagwana Ram
2022 Latest Caselaw 7928 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7928 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 May, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Nanak Ram vs Bhagwana Ram on 26 May, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Judge)
                                         (1 of 2)                       [CRLR-222/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
           S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 222/2022

Nanak Ram S/o Sh. Gopal Ram, Aged About 42 Years, B/c
Kumhar, R/o 4 Z 1St, Ramdev Colony, Sadhuwali, Teh. And Dist.
Srigagnanagar (Raj.). (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Sri
Ganganagar).
                                                                        ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.      Bhagwana Ram S/o Sh. Ramswaroop, B/c Shakya, R/o
        Sadhuwali,       P.s.    Jawahar         Nagar,          Teh.    And     Dist.
        Sriganganagar.
2.      State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :    Mr. Ram Chandra Bishnoi
For Respondent(s)          :    Mr. Pawan Bharti
                                Mr. S.K. Bhati, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

26/05/2022

     The application (IA No.01/22) is disposed of.

     It is stated at the Bar that a compromise has been arrived at

between the parties after the judgment dated 17.11.2021 passed

by the appellate court whereby the judgment dated 29.01.2018

passed by the trial has been affirmed.

     It is borne out that the complainant is not inclined to proceed

further in the matter.

     Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a

decision of Supreme Court in case of Damodar S. Prabhu vs

Sayed Babalal H [2010(5) SCC 66].

     Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,

since the parties have settled the dispute and complainant


                     (Downloaded on 27/05/2022 at 08:53:07 PM)
                                                                           (2 of 2)                [CRLR-222/2022]


                                   respondent No.1 had accepted the sum towards full and final

                                   settlement of the cheque, on the satisfaction of the complainant

                                   and in the light of provisions of Section 147 of NI Act and in view

                                   of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of

                                   Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. (supra), the

                                   sentence awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138

                                   NI Act is liable to be set aside. However, since the compromise has

                                   been arrived at after rejection of the appeal preferred by the

                                   petitioner, a cost of 15% of the cheque amount deserves to be

                                   imposed upon the petitioner in the light of the decision rendered

                                   by the Hon'ble Apex court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu

                                   (Supra).

                                        Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit 15% of the

                                   cheque amount with the State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur

                                   within a period of two weeks from today.

                                        The conviction and sentence of imprisonment awarded to the

                                   petitioner for offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments

                                   Act, vide judgment dated 29.01.2018 passed by the learned

                                   Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No.2, Sriganganagar in

                                   Criminal Case No.1704/2016 as affirmed by judgment dated

                                   17.11.2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2,

                                   Sriganganagar in Criminal Appeal Case No.16/2018, is hereby set

                                   aside on the basis of the aforesaid compromise. The order dated

                                   06.05.2022 passed by this Court is recalled.

                                        The revision petition is disposed of accordingly. All pending

                                   applications also stand disposed of.



                                                               (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

122-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter