Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suraj @ Suresh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 7659 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7659 Raj
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Suraj @ Suresh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 23 May, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                        (1 of 3)                  [CRLAS-732/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 732/2022

Suraj @ Suresh Kumar S/o Sh. Dargaram, Aged About 28 Years,
Kalapura, P.s. Shivganj, Dist. Sirohi (Raj.).
                                                                   ----Appellant
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent
                              Connected With
              S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 733/2022
Mahendra Kumar @ Hanuman S/o Sh. Desharam, Aged About 36
Years, Gokulwadi, Teh. And P.s. Sheoganj, Dist. Sirohi (Raj.).
                                                                   ----Appellant
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Govind Lal
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. SK Bhati, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

23/05/2022

In S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 732/2022:-

     List the matter tomorrow i.e. 24.05.2022.



In S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 733/2022:-

     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of

respondent-State. Hence, notice need not be issued.

     Call for the record.



                     (Downloaded on 24/05/2022 at 08:40:23 PM)
                                           (2 of 3)                   [CRLAS-732/2022]


     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.448/2022.

     Learned counsel for the appellant has shown the certificate

and submits that the sentence was temporarily suspended by the

learned trial court.

     Learned    Public      Prosecutor         opposes         the   suspension   of

sentence application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellant.

     Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) No.

448/2022 filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 30.04.2022 in Session Case No.41/2014 (CIS

No.173/2014) against appellant- Mahendra Kumar @ Hanuman

S/o Sh. Desharam shall remain suspended till final disposal of

the aforesaid appeal, provided he executes a personal bond in a

sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

Court on 05.07.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-


     1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the
           month of January of every year till the appeal is
           decided.
     2.    That if the appellant changes the place of
           residence, they will give in writing his changed
           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel
           in the High Court.
     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,
           they will give in writing their changed address to
           the trial Court.

     The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as


                       (Downloaded on 24/05/2022 at 08:40:23 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLAS-732/2022]



                                   Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

                                   appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

                                   be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused appellant do not appear before the trial court, the learned

                                   trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.

                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

166-167-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter