Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nitin Kumar vs Divya Singh
2022 Latest Caselaw 7615 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7615 Raj
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Nitin Kumar vs Divya Singh on 20 May, 2022
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2204/2022

Nitin Kumar S/o Sh. Karan Pal Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o D-236, A-Z Green Estate, Modipuram, Meerut, Up-250110.

----Petitioner Versus

1. Divya Singh W/o Nitin Kumar, A-58, Rawla, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur (Raj.).

2. Shatakashi Singh D/o Sh. Nitin Kumar, Aged About 9 Years, Minor Through Her Mother Resp. No. 1 Divya Singh

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Thanvi Mr. Vishal Singhal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Divya Singh, respondent No.1 in person.

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

20/05/2022

1. By way of present petition, the petitioner has challenged the

order dated 28.03.2022, passed by the Family Court, No.3,

Jodhpur (hereinafter referred to as 'the Family Court'), whereby

petitioner's application for taking copies of the income-tax returns

etc. on record has been rejected.

2. Mr. Thanvi, learned counsel for the petitioner, argues that

since the respondent No.1 did not file correct affidavit and

withheld particulars of her, the petitioner had furnished copies of

the income-tax returns and other documents (received under the

Right to Information Act), which ought to have been taken on

record by the Family Court. He submits that in absence of correct

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-2204/2022]

particulars of income, amount of final maintenance cannot be

determined.

3. The matter requires consideration.

4. Issue notice. Issue notice of stay application also.

5. Ms. Divya Singh, respondent No.1 accepts notice.

6. A copy of the petition be supplied to respondent No.1.

7. List this case for admission in the first week of August, 2022.

8. Meanwhile, further proceedings before the Family Court shall

remain stayed.

9. It is, however, made clear that the present order staying the

proceedings before the Family Court will not come in the way of

respondents if they initiate proceedings for recovery of the arrears

of interim maintenance that has been awarded by the Family

Court vide order dated 29.11.2019. If any such application is filed,

the Family Court shall consider the same in accordance with law,

including the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court dated

24.07.2019 in the case of Kaushalya Vs. Mukesh Jain.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 11-skm/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter