Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7090 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1490/2018
Rajasthan Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Ajmer.
----Appellant Versus Ramesh Patel S/o Shri Magan Lal, aged about 22 years, resident of V.P.O. Karoli, Tehsil Bichhiwara, District Dungarpur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. G.R. Punia, Sr. Adv. assisted by
Mr. Jai Naveen
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
12/05/2022
Heard.
Perused the record and the affidavit filed alongwith paper
publication by which notice was published in the newspaper.
After going through the affidavit and advertisement, we
record our satisfaction that the respondent has been served by
substitute service but despite service of notice, no one present to
oppose the appeal.
The appeal is reported to be barred by 41 days.
As no one appears to oppose the application and after having
perused the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we
are of the opinion that the appellant was prevented from filing the
appeal within limitation for sufficient cause. Therefore, the
(2 of 2) [SAW-1490/2018]
application is accordingly allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is
condoned.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that
controversy involved in the instant appeal stands covered by a
Bench decision of this Court dated 10.04.2018 rendered in
D.B.S.A.W No.198/2018 (Piyush Kavia & Ors. Vs. The RPSC &
Ors.), whereby the decision rendered by learned Single Judge in
SBCWP No.4440/2017 (Sajjan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan &
Ors., decided on 24.11.2017), relied upon by the learned Single
Judge while allowing writ petition, stands set aside.
Learned counsel for the appellant has further relied upon two
other decisions on the same issue in the cases of Rajasthan Public
Service Commission through its Secretary, Ajmer Vs. Hitesh Kalal
(D.B. SAW No.613/2019, decided on 11.11.2021) and Rajasthan
Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Ajmer Vs. Ishwar
Singh & Anr. (D.B. SAW No.980/2018, decided on 10.12.2018)
which were also on the same issue.
In this view of the matter, the Special Appeal is also allowed
in the light of Bench decision of this Court in the case of Piyush
Kavia (supra). The judgment under appeal is set aside.
(FARJAND ALI),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACJ
21-Hanuman/Bharti-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!