Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Xxxx vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 7027 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7027 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
K.Xxxx vs State Of Rajasthan on 11 May, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                        (1 of 3)                   [CRLAS-353/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 353/2022

K.xxxx S/o Shri Pat Xxx, Aged About 17 Years, B/c Xxx R/o Xxx,
Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.) (At Present
Lodged At Place Of Safety, Shri Ganganagar)
                                                                    ----Appellant
                                    Versus
1.     State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.     Surendra S/o Krishan Ram, Aged About 38 Years, B/c Jat,
       R/o    Village    Hardaswali          Bada       Baas,     Police   Station
       Rawatsar, Dist. Hanumangarh (Raj.)
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Vivek Sharma
                                Mr. Mohan Ram Choudhary
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, GA cum AAG
                                Mr. Rakesh Matoria



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

11/05/2022

     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the

respondent No.2 already appearing on behalf of the respondents.

Hence, service is complete.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.263/2022.

     Learned counsel for the appellant has shown the statement

rendered by the prosecutrix at the time of recovery as well as the

statement rendered under Section 161 Cr.P.C., which show the

complete consent on the part of the prosecutrix to go away with



                     (Downloaded on 12/05/2022 at 08:49:23 PM)
                                          (2 of 3)                       [CRLAS-353/2022]



the present appellant, who is also a minor. Learned counsel further

submits that the appellant is in custody since 14.11.2018, which is

about 03 years and 06 months, whereas the sentenced awarded

to him is 05 years.

     Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for

respondent No.2 vehemently oppose the suspension of sentence

application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellant.

     Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) No.

263/2022 filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 11.03.2022 in Criminal Regular Session Case

No.09/2020 against appellant- K. xxxx S/o Shri Pat xxxx shall

remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal,

provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/-

with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned   trial   Judge     for    his    appearance              in   this   Court   on

27.06.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of

the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-



     1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the
           month of January of every year till the appeal is
           decided.
     2.    That if the appellant changes the place of
           residence, they will give in writing his changed
           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel
           in the High Court.
     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,
           they will give in writing their changed address to
           the trial Court.



                      (Downloaded on 12/05/2022 at 08:49:23 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLAS-353/2022]



                                        The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

                                   Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

                                   appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

                                   be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused appellant do not appear before the trial court, the learned

                                   trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.


                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

1-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter