Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rughnathdan vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 6974 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6974 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 May, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Rughnathdan vs State Of Rajasthan on 10 May, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                 S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 621/2022

Rughnathdan S/o Shri Khemdan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o
Colonization Colony, Bajju, District Bikaner Presently Working As
Patwari (Halka Bikampur, Colonization Tehsil No. 03, Kolayat,
Headquarter Bajju, District Bikaner)
                                                                   ----Appellant
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Ankit Choudhary
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr.Arun Kumar, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

10/05/2022

     In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its

highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being

maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of

all concerned.

     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Learned Public Prosecutor already appearing on behalf of

respondent -State. Hence, notice need not be issued.

     Call for the record.

     List as soon as the record is received.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.392/2022.




                     (Downloaded on 11/05/2022 at 08:42:17 PM)
                                                (2 of 3)                       [CRLAS-621/2022]



          Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sentence

in question is temporarily suspended by the learned trial court

itself.

          Learned     Public     Prosecutor         opposes         the       suspension   of

sentence application.

          Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellant.

          Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) No.

392/2022 filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 30.04.2022 in Sessions Case No.10/2016

against appellant- Rughnathdan S/o Shri Khemdan shall

remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal,

provided that he executes a personal bond in a sum of

Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

Court on 04.07.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-


          1.   That he will appear before the trial Court in the
               month of January of every year till the appeal is
               decided.

          2.   That    if    the     appellant        changes           the   place   of
               residence, he will give in writing his changed
               address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel
               in the High Court.

          3.   Similarly, if the sureties change their address,
               they will give in writing their changed address to
               the trial Court.



                            (Downloaded on 11/05/2022 at 08:42:17 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLAS-621/2022]



                                         The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

                                   Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

                                   appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

                                   be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused appellant do not appear before the trial court, the learned

                                   trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.



                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

142-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter