Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4032 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 388/2016
Shyam Prakaash Sharma
----Appellant
Versus
Prahlad Singh Through Lrs And Others
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Daulat Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
23/05/2022
Appellant-plaintiff has filed a civil suit for damages to the
tune of Rs.3,50,000/- on which ad valorem court fee of
Rs.23,400/- was paid before the court of first instance.
The suit bearing No.494/2009 (CIS No.1012/2014) has been
dismissed by the trial court vide judgment and decree dated
31.05.2016.
On perusal of judgment and decree dated 31.05.2016, it
appears that there is a mention that stamp of Rs.225/- has been
paid whereas the record of the trial court goes to show that
additional stamps for court fees of Rs.23,400/- were produced on
01.12.2009.
Due to wrong mentioning of amount of court fees of Rs.225/-
only in the decree, the Stamp Reporter of High Court has passed
the first appeal merely on payment of the court fees of Rs.225/-
by the appellant.
(2 of 2) [CFA-388/2016]
This Court deems it just and proper to hold an inquiry into
the matter and the District Judge, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Jaipur is
directed to hold an inquiry against the concerned persons who
prepared the decree and did not mention the correct amount of
court fees paid in the suit before the trial court.
Record of the trial court be returned back.
Inquiry be concluded within a period of two months.
List the appeal again on 19.07.2022.
In the meanwhile, appellant, in the present appeal, may file
the deficit court fees before the High Court.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SAURABH/22
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!