Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3610 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 6333/2022
Ramavtar Meena S/o Shri Lakhan Meena, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o Village Badapura, Post Bhawali, Tehsil Masalpur, District
Karauli, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government
Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Additional Chief Secretary, (Mines And Petroleum),
Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat,
Jaipur.
3. Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of
Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Divisional Commissioner, Bharatpur Region, Bharatpur,
Rajasthan.
5. The District Collector, Karauli. District Karauli, Rajasthan.
6. Sub Divisional Officer, Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
7. Tehsildar Masalpur, Tehsil Masalpur, District Karauli,
Rajasthan.
8. State Pollution Control Board, Through Its Member
Secretary, 4, Institutional Area, Jhalana Dungri, Jaipur
Rajasthan.
9. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Through
Regional Manager, 3-, Talwandi Main Road, Rangwadi,
Kota Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Agarwal, Advocate
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment / Order
07/05/2022
Heard.
(2 of 2) [CW-6333/2022]
Taking into consideration the nature of relief sought in this
petition regarding proper demarcation on the land to find out
whether the part of the Government land is included in the
construction of petrol pump apart from the private land situated in
Khasra Nos. 1142, 1143 & 1144 and further taking into
consideration that on complaints made, inquiry has already been
initiated vide order dated 30.03.2022 passed by the Additional
Divisional Commissioner, Bharatpur, we are not inclined to pass
any order in this case as on the date. The Additional Divisional
Commissioner has ordered recently on 30.03.2022 and since
thereafter the petitioner has approached this Court without
awaiting the result of that case. Therefore, at this stage, no order
is required to be passed.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
In case, there is inordinate delay in conclusion of inquiry, it
will open for the petitioner to revive the petition.
(SAMEER JAIN),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Mohita /11
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!