Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4873 Raj
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 24/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
4. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Alwar.
5. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Jaipur.
6. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Sirohi.
7. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Jhalawar.
8. District Education Officer, Secondary, Bhilwara.
----Petitioners Versus
1. Lilawati Sharma D/o Ramniwas Sharma, W/o Nagendra Bhardwaj, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village And Post Badod, Tehsil Behror, Distrct Alwar.
2. Sangeeta Chauhan W/o Mahesh Singh,, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Nareheda, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur.
3. Anil Kumar Meena S/o Shri Chiranji Lal Meena,, R/o Village Jhalatala, Via Garhi Sawairam, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Alwar.
4. Usha Devi Sharma W/o Bajrang Prasad Sharma,, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village And Post Rampur, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar.
5. Santosh D/o Shri Omprakash, W/o Om Prakash Bhargava,, Aged About 41 Years, R/o House No. C-2, Madhukar Colony, Kotputli, District Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa, AGC
For Respondent(s) : -
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
31/03/2022
1. The defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled.
(2 of 2) [WRW-24/2022]
2. The present review petition is directed against the order
dated 15.12.2020, passed by this Court in writ petition filed by the
respondents.
3. A perusal of the order under consideration reveals that
though learned counsel for the petitioners had placed reliance on
the judgment rendered in case of Ramesh Chand Saini & Ors.
Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : D.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.4253/2019) and order dated 17.05.2018, passed in the case
of Lekhraj Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B.
Civil Writ Petition No.10692/2018, but the Court has not
given its verdict about the applicability of the above referred
judgments, considering that the petitioners had simply sought a
liberty to make a representation before the authorities concerned
to decide their rights in light of the judgments aforesaid.
4. It is pertinent that while disposing of the writ petition, this
Court has not given any finding about the petitioners' case being
covered by the judgments relied upon.
5. Hence, this Court does not find any error apparent on the
face of the record because rights of the petitioners have not been
decided. Obviously, the respondents shall be free to decide
petitioners' representation in accordance with law while
considering the referred judgments.
6. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed.
7. Stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 22-Ramesh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!