Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4154 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3049/2022 M/s Chhagani Ram Gehlot, Through Its Director Chhagani Ram Gehlot S/o Shri Achalu Ram Gehlot, Aged About 70 Years, R/o 327 Dilip Nagar, Lal Sagar, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Local Self Government Department, Rajasthan, Building G-3, Rajmahal, Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur.
3. The Jodhpur Municipality Corporation (North), Through Its Commissioner, Polytechnic College Campus Residency Road, Rajasthan.
4. M/s Naresh Sankhla, Through Its Proprietor Shri Naresh Sankhla R/o Plot No. 2473/16, Behind Bhadwasiya School Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Ankur Mathur
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Judgment / Order 15/03/2022
Being aggrieved with the decision of the respondent- Jodhpur
Municipality Corporation (North) of rejecting the technical bid of
the petitioner-firm, submitted by it, in response to the e-tender
dated 02.09.2021, the petitioner-firm has preferred first appeal as
per provisions of Section 38 (1) of the Rajasthan Transparency
and Public Procurement Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred as 'act of
2012') and the said appeal came to be dismissed by the first
appellate authority vide order dated 22.12.2021. Being aggrieved
with order dated 22.12.2021, the petitioner has preferred the
second appeal as provided under Section 38 (4) the act of 2012
before the second appellate authority i.e. Director, Local Self
Government Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan within limitation
period.
(2 of 2) [CW-3049/2022]
Learned counsel for the petitioner-firm has submitted that
the second appeal was preferred by the petitioner-firm in the last
week of December, 2021, however, the same has not been
decided by the second appellate authority, though, as per Section
38 (6) of the Act of 2012 the second appeal is required to be
decided within 30 days from the date of filing of appeal.
Learned counsel for the petitioner-firm has further submitted
that the 30 days time has already been expired but the second
appellate authority i.e. Director, Local Self Government
Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan has not decided the appeal filed by
the petitioner-firm till date, therefore, directions be issued to the
Director, Local Self Government Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan to
decide the second appeal of the petitioner-firm expeditiously.
In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case and
limited prayer made by the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to
dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent
No.2-Director, Local Self Government Department, Jaipur,
Rajasthan to decide the second appeal filed by the petitioners-
firm, in accordance with law after providing opportunity of hearing
to all the parties concerned, within a period of two weeks from the
date of production of the certified copy of this order.
Ordered Accordingly.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J 24-mohit/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!