Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Noor Mohammad vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 9005 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9005 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Noor Mohammad vs State Of Rajasthan on 11 July, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                        (1 of 3)                    [CRLAS-783/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 783/2022

1.     Noor Mohammad S/o Chotu Khan, Aged About 60 Years,
       R/o Koliyari, Police Station - Phalasiya, District Udaipur
       (Rajasthan) (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur)
2.     Mohan Lal S/o Nana Lal Gameti, Aged About 40 Years, R/
       o Kankarmala, Police Station - Ogana, District Udaipur
       (Rajasthan) (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur)
3.     Kevla S/o Rupa Gameti, Aged About 45 Years, R/o
       Jhanjhar,     Police     Station       -    Ogana,        District   Udaipur
       (Rajasthan) (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur)
                                                                    ----Appellants
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                   ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Rajendra Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. SS Rajpurohit, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

11/07/2022
     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the

respondent -State. Hence, notice need not be issued.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.488/2022.

     Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court considers it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellant.


                     (Downloaded on 12/07/2022 at 08:54:00 PM)
                                          (2 of 3)                 [CRLAS-783/2022]


     Accordingly,     S.B.     Suspension            of    Sentence    (Appeal)

No.488/2022 filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 11.05.2022 in Sessions Case No. 9/2017

(CIS No.164/2017) against appellants (1) Noor Mohammad S/

o Chotu Khan, (2) Mohan Lal S/o Nana Lal Gameti & (3)

Kevla S/o Rupa Gameti shall remain suspended till final disposal

of the aforesaid appeal, provided each of them executes a

personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for

their appearance in this Court on 16.08.2022 and whenever

ordered to do so, till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions

indicated below:-

     1.    That they will appear before the trial Court in the

           month of January of every year till the appeal is

           decided.

     2.    That if the appellants changes the place of

           residence, they will give in writing their changed

           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

           in the High Court.

     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

           they will give in writing their changed address to

           the trial Court.

     The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellants in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-appellants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order

shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

                      (Downloaded on 12/07/2022 at 08:54:00 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLAS-783/2022]


                                   file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

                                   to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

                                   said accused appellants do not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.


                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

164-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter