Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 565 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 301/2021
State of Rajasthan and Anr.
----Appellants
Versus
Saraswati Degree College
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Prakhar Gupta on behalf of Dr. V.B. Sharma, AAG through VC For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
21/01/2022
It appears that though the appeal is filed in time, by way of
abandoned caution an application for condonation of delay has
been filed. Such application is disposed of as not required.
This appeal arises out of a common judgment of the learned
Single Judge dated 07.09.2020 by which bunch of writ petitions
came to be allowed. The petitioners involved in those petitions
before the learned Single Judge are private educational
institutions imparting higher education. Such institutions require
recognition by the Government in terms of Section 3 of the
Rajasthan Non-Government Education Institutions Act, 1989 (for
short 'the Act') and the Rules made thereunder. Some of these
institutions were granted temporary recognition whereas the rest
were granted permanent recognition. The Government of
Rajasthan would charge yearly fee of Rs.30,000/- from these
(2 of 2) [SAW-301/2021]
institutions. These institutions had objected to such charge.
Learned Single Judge allowed the petitions.
We have heard learned counsel for the State and prima facie
notice that recognition is to be granted in terms of Section 3 which
can be withdrawn as provided in Section 5 of the Act. the kinds of
recognition i.e. permanent or temporary are provided under Rule
4 of the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions
Rules, 1993 (for short, 'the said Rules'). Temporary recognition
could be converted into permanent after three years after fulfilling
the conditions. As per Rule 4(ii)(d) of the said Rules permanent
recognition would be granted provided the institution, besides
other conditions, complies with the minimum physical and
financial norms and other conditions as laid down in Appendix-II.
Appendix-II in turn refers to the fee that may be charged by the
Government as per Rules prescribed from time to time. We also
notice that Rule 5 pertains to procedure for recognition. Sub-rule
(9) of Rule 5 of the said Rules provides that competent authority
shall arrange for inspection of the institutions from time to time
for supervision over the activities and functions of the institutions
and record its findings on the file maintained for the purpose.
Looking to the above statutory provisions, prima facie it
appears that the fee charged by the Government from the
institutions whether they are granted temporary or permanent
recognition, is with the authority of law.
Issue notice, returnable on 22.03.2022.
By way of interim relief, impugned judgment is stayed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J (AKIL KURESHI),CJ
KAMLESH KUMAR/7
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!