Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 563 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2022
(1 of 2) [CW-377/2022]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 377/2022
Hanuman Prasad Jangid S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Jangid, Aged
About 37 Years, R/o 1239 Parekon Ka Mohalla Village And Post
Phagi, Tehsil Phagi District Jaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner (Raj.)
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Barmer.
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur.
5. Chief District Education Officer, Barmer.
6. Chief District Education Officer, Jaipur.
7. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Shiv, District
Barmer.
8. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Phagi,
District Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Jhajharia on VC
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
11/01/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its
highly infectious Omicron variant, lawyers have been advised to
refrain from coming to the Courts.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this
Court towards the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this
Court in Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP
(Downloaded on 13/01/2022 at 08:40:34 PM)
(2 of 2) [CW-377/2022]
No.9753/2021) decided on 03.08.2021 and therefore, the
petitioner is also entitled to the same relief as granted in the case
of Manoj Kumar (supra).
In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by
the petitioner is disposed of with the similar directions as given in
the case of Manoj Kumar (supra), which read as under:-
"Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the issue involved in the present writ petition is
covered by the Coordinate Bench decision dated
14.03.2019 rendered in the case of Ashok Kumar
Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (SB Civil Writ
Petition No.15411/2018) and in the case of Dhanraj
Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (SB Civil Writ
Petition No.12846/2017), decided on 15.01.2018.
In view of the aforesaid, the present writ
petition is also allowed in terms of the judgments
rendered in the case of Ashok Kumar Sharma (supra)
and Dhanraj Meena (supra) and it is directed that the
respondents while dealing with the case of the
petitioner pertaining to his pay fixation etc. would
follow the provisions of Rules 24 & 26 of the RSR as
per law. The stay application is also disposed of."
All pending applications also stand disposed of
accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
113-Sudheer/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!