Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri Premnarayan Mathur Son Of ... vs Tarachand Saini
2022 Latest Caselaw 7643 Raj/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7643 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
Shri Premnarayan Mathur Son Of ... vs Tarachand Saini on 6 December, 2022
Bench: Inderjeet Singh
        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

               S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18046/2022

Shri Premnarayan Mathur Son Of Late Shri Parbhu Narayan
Mathur, Aged About 55 Years, R/o House No. 2294, Jhalaniyo Ka
Rasta, Opposite Devdas Ki Bagichi Ki Gali, First Chouraha Of
Khajane Walo Ka Rasta, Chandpole Rasta, Jaipur, Presently
House    No.   3-M.a      Indra      Gandhi        Nagar,         Jagatpura,   Jaipur
(Rajasthan)
                                                                       ----Petitioner

                                     Versus

Tarachand Saini, Proprietor, Bright Star Tailor, R/o House No.
2294, Jhalaniyo Ka Rasta, Opposite Devdas Ki Baghichi Ki Gali,
First Chouraha Of Khajane Walo Ka Rasta, Chandpole Rasta,
Jaipur, R/o Durga Niwas, Near Pooja Motors, Nadhi Ka Phatak,
Bainad Road, Jaipur.
                                                                     ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Mohd. Adil
For Respondent(s)          :



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

Order

06/12/2022

The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with

the prayer to direct the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan-II,

Jaipur to decide the eviction petition No.222/2021 expeditiously.

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the application is

pending before the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur.

Counsel further submits that according to the scheme of Rent

Control Act, 2001, the eviction petition has to be decided within a

period of 240 days.

(2 of 2) [CW-18046/2022]

In support of contentions, counsel relied upon the judgment

passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Hameed

Kunju vs. Nazimin, reported in (2017) 8 Supreme Court

Cases 611, wherein it has been held as under:-

"43. Before parting, we consider it apposite to observe that the object of the Rent Laws all over the State is to ensure speedy disposal of eviction cases between the landlord and tenant and especially those cases where the landlord seek eviction for his bona fide need.

44. We sincerely feel that the eviction matters should be given priority in their disposal at all stages of litigation and especially where the eviction is claimed on the ground of bona fide need of the landlord. We hope and trust that due attention would be paid by all courts to ensure speedy disposal of eviction cases."

In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of

with a direction to the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur

to decide the eviction petition No.222/2021 preferably within a

period of one year.

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

AARZOO ARORA /140

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter