Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14129 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14210/2022
Smt. Vijaylaxmi Tailor W/o Late Shri Satyanaryan Tailor, Aged About 58 Years, By Caste Tailor, R/o Village Hurda, Tehsil Hurda, Dist. Bhilwara.
----Petitioner Versus
1. Appu Devi W/o Late Shri Satyanarayan Tailor, Aged About 42 Years, Basant Vihar Colony, Ward No. 9, Near M.k Marriage Hall, Madanganj, Kishangarh, Dist. Ajmer.
2. Tushar Tailor S/o Late Shri Satyanarayan Tailor, Aged About 15 Years, Minor Through His Natural Guardian Mother Appu Devi W/o Late Shri Satyanarayan Tailor, R/o Basant Vihar Colony, Ward No. 9, Near M.k Marriage Hall, Madanganj, Kishangarh, Dist. Ajmer.
3. Sameer Tailor S/o Late Shri Satyanarayan Tailor, Aged About 13 Years, Minor Through His Natural Guardian Mother Appu Devi W/o Late Shri Satyanarayan Tailor, R/o Basant Vihar Colony, Ward No. 9, Near M.k Marriage Hall, Madanganj, Kishangarh, Dist. Ajmer.
4. Smt. Priyanka D/o Late Shri Satyanaryan Tailor W/o Shri Ravi Tailor, Aged About 33 Years, Near Masjid, Old Bus Stand, Bagru, Dist. Jaipur.
5. Ajay Kumar Tailor S/o Late Shri Satyanarayan Tailor, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Tailor, R/o Village Hurda, Tehsil Hurda, Dist. Bhilwara.
6. Jai Kumar Tailor S/o Late Shri Satyanarayan Tailor, Aged About 28 Years, By Caste Tailor, R/o Village Hurda, Tehsil Hurda, Dist. Bhilwara.
7. Sanjay Kumar Tailor S/o Late Shri Satyanarayan Tailor, Aged About 25 Years, By Caste Tailor, R/o Village Hurda, Tehsil Hurda, Dist. Bhilwara.
8. The Chief District Education Officer, Ajmer, Dist. Ajmer.
----Respondents
(2 of 2) [CW-14210/2022]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Sisodia, Mr. Jaipal Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
01/12/2022
Heard.
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner being
aggrieved with the order dated 17.8.2022 passed by the
Addl. Distt. & Sessions Judge, Gulabpura, Distt. Bhilwara (for
short 'the trial court') in Case No.12/2020, titled as
'Smt. Vijaylaxmi Vs. Smt. Priyanka & Ors.', wherein in the
proceedings under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act,
1925, the trial court has allowed the application preferred on
behalf of the respondent Nos.4 to 7 and impleaded them as
party respondents in the said proceedings.
After attempting to argue the matter on merits for quite
some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
that he does not want to press this writ petition, however,
seeks liberty for the petitioner to produce all her evidence
before the trial court.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed
with the liberty sought for.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
64-msrathore/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!