Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5688 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No.423/2022
Shrimati Laddo Devi Wife Of Chetram Meena
----Appellant
Versus
Shrimati Panchi Devi Wife Of Late Ramu & Ors.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Prakash Chand Jain Mr. Zeeshan Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
22/08/2022
Appellants-plaintiffs have preferred this first appeal feeling
aggrieved by dismissal of their civil suit for specific performance
and permanent injunction vide judgment dated 13.05.2022 passed
by Additional District Judge No.9, Jaipur Metro-I in Civil Suit
No.28/2014.
Learned counsel for appellants submits that original plaintiff
had issued a power of attorney in favour of her son, who adduced
his evidence and produced the power of attorney on record. He
submits that as per evidence on record, the agreement in question
is proved and suit for specific performance deserves to be decreed
but the trial court dismissed the suit, recording a finding that the
power of attorney has not been produced and the evidence of son
of plaintiff, may not be held sufficient to prove the agreement.
Heard.
Admit.
Issue notice to respondents.
(2 of 2) [CFA-423/2022]
On request of counsel for appellant, service of notices upon
respondent Nos.5, 6, 7 and 8, who are proforma respondents, is
dispensed with at the risk and costs of appellants.
Issue notice to respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Call for the record.
In the meanwhile, both parties shall maintain status quo in
relation to the alienation of the suit property in question. Final
order on stay application shall be passed after service of notices
upon respondents.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SAURABH/15
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!