Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinod Jangid S/O Shri Rameshwar ... vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 5655 Raj/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5655 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
Vinod Jangid S/O Shri Rameshwar ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 August, 2022
Bench: Uma Shanker Vyas
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

          S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1439/2021

Vinod Jangid S/o Shri Rameshwar Jangid, Resident Of Plot No.
169, Suryanagar, Jamnapuri Murlipura, Jaipur
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
1.     State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
2.     Kailashchand      Jangid      S/o      Shri     Laxminarayan      Jangid,
       Resident Of Plot No. 4, Vijay Badi, Dahar Ka Balaji, Jaipur
                                                                ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Adv., For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, P.P.

Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar, Adv.,

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

Order

18/08/2022

The present revision petition has been filed against the

judgment dated 26.11.2021 passed by the learned Appellate Court

in Regular Criminal Appeal No.14/2021 affirming the judgment

and order dated 09.03.2021 passed by the learned Trial Court in

Regular Criminal (Complaint) Case No.866/2016 whereby the

accused-petitioner was convicted and sentenced under Section

138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to six months simple

imprisonment with a direction to pay a sum of Rs.1,70,000/- as

compensation and in default of payment of fine, to further

undergo one month additional simple imprisonment.

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that

during pendency of the present revision petition, the dispute of

(2 of 2) [CRLR-1439/2021]

non-payment of the amount has been settled between the parties

by entering into a compromise.

Perused the record. The compromise, duly verified by the

Registrar (Judicial), is available on record. The offence u/s. 138 of

the Negotiable Instruments Act is compoundable, hence, the

accused-petitioner deserves to be acquitted on the basis of

compromise.

In view of compromise having been entered into between the

parties, the present revision petition is allowed. The orders passed

by the learned trial court as well as by the learned appellate court

dated 09.03.2021 & 26.11.2021 are hereby set aside and the

accused-petitioner is acquitted.

If the accused-petitioner is in judicial custody, he be released

forthwith.

In view of above the application for SOS stands disposed of.

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

KESHAV GHIYA /8

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter