Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5655 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1439/2021
Vinod Jangid S/o Shri Rameshwar Jangid, Resident Of Plot No.
169, Suryanagar, Jamnapuri Murlipura, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
2. Kailashchand Jangid S/o Shri Laxminarayan Jangid,
Resident Of Plot No. 4, Vijay Badi, Dahar Ka Balaji, Jaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Adv., For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, P.P.
Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar, Adv.,
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
18/08/2022
The present revision petition has been filed against the
judgment dated 26.11.2021 passed by the learned Appellate Court
in Regular Criminal Appeal No.14/2021 affirming the judgment
and order dated 09.03.2021 passed by the learned Trial Court in
Regular Criminal (Complaint) Case No.866/2016 whereby the
accused-petitioner was convicted and sentenced under Section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to six months simple
imprisonment with a direction to pay a sum of Rs.1,70,000/- as
compensation and in default of payment of fine, to further
undergo one month additional simple imprisonment.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that
during pendency of the present revision petition, the dispute of
(2 of 2) [CRLR-1439/2021]
non-payment of the amount has been settled between the parties
by entering into a compromise.
Perused the record. The compromise, duly verified by the
Registrar (Judicial), is available on record. The offence u/s. 138 of
the Negotiable Instruments Act is compoundable, hence, the
accused-petitioner deserves to be acquitted on the basis of
compromise.
In view of compromise having been entered into between the
parties, the present revision petition is allowed. The orders passed
by the learned trial court as well as by the learned appellate court
dated 09.03.2021 & 26.11.2021 are hereby set aside and the
accused-petitioner is acquitted.
If the accused-petitioner is in judicial custody, he be released
forthwith.
In view of above the application for SOS stands disposed of.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
KESHAV GHIYA /8
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!