Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Govind Khandelwal Son Of Late Shri ... vs Nagarpalika Mandal Chomu
2022 Latest Caselaw 5512 Raj/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5512 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
Govind Khandelwal Son Of Late Shri ... vs Nagarpalika Mandal Chomu on 4 August, 2022
Bench: Sudesh Bansal
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

                S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 310/2022

Govind Khandelwal Son Of Late Shri Rameshwar Ji Tamboli &
Ors.
                                                                  ----Appellants
                                   Versus
Nagarpalika Mandal Chomu & Anr.
                                                                ----Respondents

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajat Ranjan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta with Mr. S.S. Sharma

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

Order

04/08/2022

Appellants-plaintiff have preferred this first appeal against

the judgment and decree 25.04.2022, whereby and whereunder

their civil suit has been dismissed on merits.

Learned counsel for appellants does not dispute that thadi in

question is in use, occupation and possession of respondent No.2

and Nagarpalika Mandal, Chomu has regularized his possession.

However, plaintiffs have sought declaration to declare the

regularization as null and void and for mandatory and permanent

injunction to get back the possession of the thadi in question.

Heard.

Admit.

Issue notice to respondents.

Since, respondent No.2 has put in appearance as caveator,

notices be issued only to remaining respondents.

Call for the record.

(2 of 2) [CFA-310/2022]

Heard counsel for both parties on the stay application.

In view of undisputed fact that thadi in question is in use,

occupation and possession of respondent No.2, who is carrying on

a business thereupon and the same has also been regularized in

his favour, this Court deems it just and proper that during

pendency of this present appeal, respondent No.2 will not sell the

thadi in question to any other person. However, it is also observed

that appellant would not interfere in use and occupation of the

thadi in question during course of first appeal merely on account

of pedency of this first appeal.

With aforesaid discussion, the stay application stands

disposed of.

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

SACHIN/9

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter