Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahendra vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 10699 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10699 Raj
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Mahendra vs State Of Rajasthan on 22 August, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                 S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1295/2022

1.     Kailash S/o Kanti Lal, Aged About 25 Years, Mahuval P.s.
       Pahada Dist. Udaipur. (Sentence Already Suspended).
2.     Satish S/o Hira Lal, Aged About 20 Years, Mahuval P.s.
       Pahada Dist. Udaipur. (Sentence Already Suspended).
                                                                  ----Appellants
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent
                              Connected With
            S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1294/2022
Mahendra S/o Padam Chand, Aged About 24 Years, Mahuval P.s.
Pahada   Dist.     Udaipur.     (At     Present       Lodged     In   Dist.   Jail,
Dungarpur).
                                                                   ----Appellant
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Jitendra Ojha
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                      Order

22/08/2022

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1295/2022 :

     Admit.

     Call for the record.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application

seeking suspension of sentence no.732/2022.

     Counsel for the appellant submits that the sentence of

appellants has already been suspended temporarily for a period

                     (Downloaded on 24/08/2022 at 08:44:50 PM)
                                       (2 of 3)                   [CRLAS-1295/2022]


of one month by the learned trial court, thus, prayed to suspend

the sentence.

     Learned PP opposed the application.

     Having considered of the totality of facts and circumstances

of the case, I consider it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused appellants.


     Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentences is

allowed and it is directed that the sentences awarded to

appellant/s - (1) Kailash S/o Kanti Lal and (2) Satish S/o

Hira Lal by the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases,

Dungarpur vide judgment dated                29.07.2022 in Sessions Case

No.37/2020 shall remain suspended till final disposal of aforesaid

appeal provided each of the appellant executes a personal bond

for a sum of Rs.50,000/- alongwith two solvent sureties in the

sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court

for their appearance before this Court on 29.09.2022 and

whenever called upon to do so till the disposal of the appeal on

the conditions indicated below:-

      (1)   That he/she/they will appear before the trial court in
      the month of January of every year till the appeal is
      decided.
      (2)   That     if   the    applicant(s)        changes     the   place   of
      residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their
      changed address to the trial court as well as to the
      counsel in the High Court.
      (3)   Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s),
      they will give in writing their changed address(s) to the
      trial court.
     The learned trial court shall keep the record of attendance

of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be

                     (Downloaded on 24/08/2022 at 08:44:50 PM)
                                                                        (3 of 3)                   [CRLAS-1295/2022]


                                   registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in

                                   which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A

                                   copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready

                                   reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for

                                   statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in

                                   the trial court. In case the said accused-applicant(s) does not

                                   appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report

                                   the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.



                                   S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1294/2022 :

                                        Call for the record. Requisition be given 'dasti'.

                                         List as soon as the record is received.


                                                               (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

228-229 Sanjay/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter