Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tejpal vs State Of Rajasthan-State
2022 Latest Caselaw 4906 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4906 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Tejpal vs State Of Rajasthan-State on 1 April, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                         (1 of 3)                  [CRLR-237/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
           S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 237/2022

1.     Tejpal S/o Chunna Ram, Aged About 43 Years, B/c Jat,
       R/o Gadhwala, Dist. Bikaner (Raj.). (At Present Lodged In
       Dist. Jail, Bikaner).
2.     Chuna Ram S/o Jetha Ram, Aged About 61 Years, B/c Jat,
       R/o Gadhwala, Dist. Bikaner (Raj.). (At Present Lodged In
       Dist. Jail, Bikaner).
                                                                  ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan-State, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. S.S. Khatri.
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP.



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

01/04/2022

     In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its

highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being

maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of

all concerned.

     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the

State. Hence, notice need not be issued.

     Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned

Public Prosecutor on S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Revision)

No.56/2022.

     I have considered the rival arguments advanced by the

                     (Downloaded on 04/04/2022 at 08:33:30 PM)
                                             (2 of 3)                 [CRLR-237/2022]


parties and perused the judgments of the courts below.

        Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the

short sentence awarded by the learned trial court, this Court

deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the

accused petitioners.

        Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Revision)

No.56/2022 filed under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Additional Chief

Judicial Magistrate in Cr. Case No.584/2003 vide order dated

16.09.2019 as affirmed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge

No.7,    Bikaner   vide      order      dated      09.03.2022       in   Cr.   Appeal

No.11/2020 (C.I.S. No.40/2017) against the petitioners (1)

Tejpal S/o Chunna Ram and (2) Chuna Ram S/o Jetha Ram

shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision

petition and they shall be released on bail, provided each of them

executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

Judge for their appearance in this court on 02.05.2022 and

whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the revision on the

conditions indicated below:-

        1.   That they will appear before the trial Court in the

             month of January of every year till the revision is

             decided.

        2.   That if the petitioners changes the place of

             residence, they will give in writing their changed

             address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

             in the High Court.

        3.   Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

                        (Downloaded on 04/04/2022 at 08:33:30 PM)
                                                                                (3 of 3)                [CRLR-237/2022]


                                                they will give in writing their changed address to

                                                the trial Court.

                                        The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-petitioners in a separate file. Such file be registered

                                   as Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the

                                   accused-petitioners were tried and convicted. A copy of this order

                                   shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

                                   file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

                                   to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

                                   said accused petitioners do not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.


                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

9-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter