Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6161 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. (SOS) Application No.910/2021
In
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1487/2021
1. Pradhan S/o Ramniwas, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Barh-
Gulal P/s Kudgaon Distt. Karauli (Raj) (Accused Confined
In District Jail Karauli)
2. Lajja S/o Ramniwas, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Barh-Gulal
P/s Kudgaon Distt. Karauli (Raj) (Accused Confined In
District Jail Karauli)
----Appellants
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajendra Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, PP
Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun, complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
29/10/2021
Heard on application for suspension of sentence.
The appellants have filed the appeal along with
application for suspension of sentence.
The appeal has been preferred against the judgment of
conviction and sentence dated 09.09.2021 and sentence dated
14.09.2021 passed by the Court of Special Judge, Dacoity Affected
Area Cases (District and Sessions Judge, Karauli) (Raj.) in Session
Case No.17/2011, by which the accused-appellant-Pradhan has
been held guilty for commission of offence under Sections 323,
(2 of 3) [CRLAS-1487/2021]
325 and 308 of IPC and accused-appellant-Lajja has been held
guilty for commission of offence under Sections 323, 325 and 308
of IPC with the aid of Section 34 IPC and sentenced to maximum
term of five years rigorous imprisonment.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
appellants that the appellants have been convicted for offence
under Sections 323, 325 and 308/ 323, 325 and 308 of IPC with
the aid of Section 34 IPC of IPC and sentenced to maximum term
of five years rigorous imprisonment. During trial, the appellants
were on bail. Now, they are in judicial custody since 09.09.2021.
All the injuries to the injured person are on non-vital part of the
body. No injury has been described as dangerous to life. Decision
of the appeal may consume considerable time.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the
evidence available on record carefully.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application
for suspension of sentence.
Taking into consideration the submissions of learned
counsel for the appellants, evidence available on record and
overall facts and circumstances of the case but without
commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems
just and proper to allow the application for suspension of
sentence.
Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence
is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-
appellants (1) Pradhan S/o Ramniwas and (2) Lajja S/o Ramniwas
shall remain suspended till disposal of this criminal appeal and
(3 of 3) [CRLAS-1487/2021]
they shall be released on bail, provided each of the appellants
furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) and two
sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance in this
Court on 29th November, 2021 and as and when called upon to do
so.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Sunita/32
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!