Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6000 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12076/2021
S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No.11550/2021
Naresh Chand Bijawat Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Bijawat
----Petitioner
Versus
Bank Of Baroda & Ors.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Ashish Saksena for Mr. S.K. Saksena For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order
26/10/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without
following the principles of natural justice, his pension is being
deducted by the respondents alleging excess payment. He submits
that a Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, in case
of Naini Gopal Vs. The Union of India and Ors.,
MANU/MH/1018/2020 in identical circumstances, relying on
the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court of India in case of High
Court of Punjab and Haryana and Ors. Vs. Jagdev Singh
(2016) 14 SCC 267, quashed the action of the respondents-bank
therein in deducting the amount paid in excess and also directed
to refund the amount already recovered from pension of the
petitioner therein.
Issue notice. Rule is made returnable by five weeks. Notices
be filed in two sets. One set of notices be sent through registered
post with acknowledgment due. Steps to be taken within a week.
(2 of 2) [CW-12076/2021]
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on interim relief.
In the meanwhile, there shall be no recovery from the
pension account of the petitioner.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Sudha/65
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!