Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5859 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S. B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence App. No. 256/2021
IN
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 889/2021
1. Sushil Goyal S/o Shri Ramjilal Goyal, R/o Sarafa Bazar,
H.no. 122/14 Ghee Mandi, Police Station Dargah, Ajmer
H.no 62, Haribhau Updhaya Nagar, Main Pushkar Road,
Ajmer
2. Smt. Sunita Goyal W/o Shri Sushil Goyal, R/o Sarafa
Bazar, H.no. 122/14, Ghee Mandi, Police Station Dargah,
Ajmer / H.no 62, Haribhau Updhyaya Nagar, Main Pushkar
Road, Ajmer
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
25/10/2021
1. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.
2. The petitioners have filed the revision petition along
with application for suspension of sentence.
3. The revision petition has been preferred against the
judgment dated 07.04.2021 passed by the Additional Session
Judge No. 5, Ajmer (the Appellate Court) in criminal appeal No.
47/2018 affirming the order dated 30.08.2018 passed by the
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Ajmer (the trial court) in
(2 of 3) [SOSR-256/2021]
regular criminal case No. 807/2016 (1717/2015) (744/2009), by
which the petitioners have been convicted for offence/s under
Sections 420 and 471 IPC and sentenced to maximum term of two
years imprisonment.
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioner that petitioners have been sentenced to maximum term
of two years imprisonment. As per certificate under Rule 311(3) of
Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952, the petitioners were on bail
during trial as well as during pendency of the appeal. Now, they
are in judicial custody since 13.09.2021. The main accused-
Ummed Singh has been acquitted of all charges. Decision of
revision petition may take considerable time.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application
for suspension of sentence.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the
evidence available on record.
7. Taking into consideration the submissions of learned
counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the
case but without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court
deems just and proper to allow the application for suspension of
sentence.
8. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence
is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-
petitioners 1. Sushil Goyal S/o Shri Ramjilal Goyal and 2. Smt.
Sunita Goyal W/o Shri Sushil Goyal, shall remain suspended till
disposal of this revision petition and they shall be released on bail
provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/-
(3 of 3) [SOSR-256/2021]
(Fifty Thousand) and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five
Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for
their appearance in this Court on 25.11.2021 and as and when
called upon to do so.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Pooja /95
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!