Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5769 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence
Application No.201/2021
In
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 816/2021
1. Sonu @ Surendra S/o Chotulal, R/o Kason Ka Mohalla,
Ataru, Police Station Ataru, District Baran (Raj)
(Presently Confined In Sub Jail Baran)
2. Raju S/o Pushpchand, R/o Kason Ka Mohalla, Ataru, Police
Station Ataru, District Baran,
(Presently Confined In Sub Jail Baran)
----Accused-Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gorishanker Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
22/10/2021
Heard on application for suspension of sentence.
Petitioners have filed the revision petition along with
application for suspension of sentence.
This revision petition has been preferred against the
judgment dated 07.08.2021 passed by Additional District and
Sessions Judge No.2, Baran (the Appellate Court) in Criminal
Appeal No.97/2018 (CIS No.172/2018), affirming the order dated
27.06.2016 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ataru,
District Baran (the trial court) in Criminal Case No.842/2013, by
which the petitioner has been convicted for offence/s under
(2 of 3) [CRLR-816/2021]
Sections 457 and 380 of IPC and sentenced to maximum term of
two years imprisonment.
It has been submitted on behalf of learned counsel for the
petitioners that the learned Courts below have erred in convicting
and sentencing the petitioners. There is no cogent and reliable
evidence on record to connect the petitioners with crime. The
maximum sentence awarded is of two years of imprisonment.
Certificate under Rule 311(3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules
has been placed on record, according which the petitioners were
on bail during trial as well as during pendency of appeal and at
present, they are in judicial custody since the date of judgment
i.e. 07.08.2021. Decision of the revision petition will take
considerable time.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application for
suspension of sentence.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the
evidence available on record carefully.
Taking into consideration the submissions of learned counsel
for the petitioners, overall facts and circumstances of the case but
without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court
deems it just and proper to allow the application for suspension of
sentence.
Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is
allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to
accused/petitioners Sonu @ Surendra S/o Chotulal and Raju
S/o Pushpchand shall remain suspended till disposal of this
revision petition and they be released on bail, provided each of
them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of
(3 of 3) [CRLR-816/2021]
Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for
their appearance in this Court on 23 rd November, 2021 and as and
when called upon to do so.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Hemant/36
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!