Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Virender Singh Son Of Nihal Singh vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 5660 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5660 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 20 October, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Virender Singh Son Of Nihal Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 20 October, 2021
Bench: Manoj Kumar Vyas
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

 S. B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence App. No. 929/2021
                                       In
              S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1508/2021

1.     Virender Singh Son Of Nihal Singh,
2.     Jagdish Son Of Nihal Singh,
3.     Nihal Singh Son Of Balmat,
4.     Smt. Brijesh Wife Of Virender Singh,
5.     Lakhmi Son Of Nihal Singh,
       All Resident Of Nagla Bahua, P.S.                        Nadbai   District
       Bharatpur
       (Accused In Central Jail, Bharatpur)
                                                      ----Accused- Appellants
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P
                                                                ----Respondent

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, PP Mr. Nitin Jain

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS

Order

20/10/2021

1. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.

2. The application for suspension of sentence has been

filed by the appellants against the judgment and order dated

23.09.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge No. 3, Bharatpur,

in Sessions Case No. 6/2018 by which the appellants have been

convicted and sentenced as under:-

Under Section 148 of IPC Two years RI with fine of Rs.2000/- in default to undergo additional RI of two months.

Under Section 341 of IPC One month SI with fine of

(2 of 3) [CRLAS-1508/2021]

Rs. 500/- in default to undergo additional SI of 7 days.

Under Section 323/149 of IPC Six months SI with fine of Rs. 500/- in default to undergo additional SI of 15 days.

Under Section 324/149 of IPC Two years RI with fine of Rs. 2000/- in default to undergo additional RI of two months.

Under Section 325/149 of IPC Two years RI with fine of Rs. 3000/- in default to undergo additional RI of three months.

Under Section 307/149 of IPC Five years RI with fine of Rs. 8000/- in default to undergo additional RI of Six months.

It is also ordered to pay compensation, from the fine amount of Rs. 80,000/- as under:-

Rs. 50,000/- to injured Narayan, Rs. 20,000/- to injured Vijay Singh, Rs. 2500/- each to Mohkam and Santra and the rest amount of fine of Rs. 5000/- to be deposited in Govt. Treasury.

3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the

appellants that accused-appellants were on bail during trial. They

are facing trial since last eight years. They have been convicted

and sentenced under Section 307/149 of IPC for which there is no

definite medical opinion about the nature of injuries that those

were dangerous to life. Injury report Ex.P14 was prepared on

17.05.2013 and x-ray report Ex.P17 was also prepared on

17.05.2013, while the medical opinion regarding nature of

injuries, by Ex.P19, has been given on 25.02.2014. According to

which, injuries mentioned may be dangerous to life to the patient.

No definite opinion has been given regarding nature of injury.

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-1508/2021]

Ex.P19 has been prepared after almost nine months of the injury

report, which creates doubt upon the prosecution case.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel

for the complainant have opposed the application for suspension

of sentence and have stated that injured PW3 and PW7 have

received several grievous injuries by blunt as well as sharp

weapons.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions of learned

counsel for the parties, evidence available on record and overall

facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon

merits of the case, this Court deems just and proper to allow the

application for suspension of sentence.

6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence

is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-

appellants 1. Virender Singh Son Of Nihal Singh, 2. Jagdish Son Of

Nihal Singh, 3. Nihal Singh Son Of Balmat, 4. Smt. Brijesh Wife Of

Virender Singh and 5. Lakhmi Son Of Nihal Singh, shall remain

suspended till disposal of this criminal appeal and they shall be

released on bail provided each of the appellants furnishes a

personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (One Lakh) and two sureties of

Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial court for their appearance in this Court on

20.11.2021 and as and when called upon to do so.

(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J

Pooja /17

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter