Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5567 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2021
PHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2944/2021
Vikas Kumar S/o Indraj Singh, R/o Village Kishari, Post Bahur
Bass, Police Station Mandawa, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. F.R. Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order
04/10/2021 This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 has been filed
assailing the validity of the judgment dated 26.03.2021 passed by
the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Jaipur Metropolitan-I
whereby the revision petition filed against the order dated
06.03.2021 passed by the Court of learned Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, Jaipur Metropolitan-I dismissing the application filed
by the accused-petitioner under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., has been
dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge
sheet/complaint in the present case was filed beyond the period of
60/90 days and hence, he was entitled for the benefit of default
bail. He, therefore, relying on the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court
of India in case of Rakesh Kumar Paul Vs. State of Assam:
(2017) 15 SCC 67, prayed for benefit of bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer.
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-2944/2021]
Indisputably, the application seeking default bail came to be
filed by the petitioner after about five months from the date of
filing of the charge sheet/complaint against the petitioner under
Sections 3 and 3/9 of Official Secrets Act, 1923 and no application
seeking bail was pending on the day the charge sheet/complaint
was filed. It is trite law that indefeasible right under Section
167(2) Cr.P.C. is available only if application is filed before filing of
the charge sheet and once charge sheet has been filed, one
cannot take benefit of default bail by moving an application
subsequently. In the aforesaid circumstances, the learned
revisional Court has committed no error in dismissing the revision
petition filed by the petitioner.
This criminal misc. petition is dismissed being devoid of
merit.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
MADAN/40
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!