Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jagdish vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 16435 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16435 Raj
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Jagdish vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 October, 2021
Bench: Manoj Kumar Garg

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 869/2021

Jagdish S/o Mangilal Vishnoi, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Niwasi Madhniyo Ki Dhani Ekalkhori, Police Thana Osian Distt. Jodhpur.

                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. Budha Ram Godara.
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. M.S. Bhati, P.P.



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

                         Judgment / Order

28/10/2021


Petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition under

Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. to assail the impugned

judgment dated 11.06.2021 passed by Learned Special Judge,

NDPS Cases Falodi, District Jodhpur (for short, 'learned trial

Court') whereby the learned trial Court rejected the application

under Section 457 Cr.P.C., moved by the petitioner for releasing

the Hyundai Verna CRDI EX 1.6 bearing No.RJ 19 CD 2729, Chesis

No.MALCU41ULBM021314, Engine No.D4FBBU977424.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the resopndent-State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of his

arguments, has placed reliance on a decision of the co-ordinate

Bench of this Court rendered at Jaipur Bench in Prakash Chand Vs.

State of Rajasthan reported in 2010(1) Cr.L.R.(Raj.) 507. In the

(2 of 3) [CRLR-869/2021]

aforesaid judgment, the vehicle and other articles were seized

from the accused for carrying contraband of small quantity just

above the commercial quantity. It is in this background, that the

Court has acceded to the prayer of the incumbent and recorded its

finding that solely for the reason that the vehicle and other

articles are likely to be confiscated after trial, conditional release

of the vehicle and other articles on Supurdginama and surety

cannot be denied and interim custody of the vehicle and other

articles can be granted to the incumbent on certain conditions.

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs.

State of Gujarat reported in 2002 (10) SCC 283 and co-ordinate

Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench in case of Prakash Chand

(supra) has held that conditional release of the vehicle cannot be

denied.

Accordingly, the instant revision petition is allowed and the

order dated 11.06.2021 is hereby quashed and set aside and the

Hyundai Verna CRDI EX 1.6 bearing No.RJ 19 CD 2729, Chesis

No.MALCU41ULBM021314, Engine No.D4FBBU977424 in question

is ordered to be released on 'supardgi' till the completion of the

trial upon following conditions:-

(a) the petitioner furnishes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.6,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.3,00,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the trial Court undertaking to produce the vehicle

Hyundai Verna CRDI EX 1.6 bearing No.RJ 19 CD 2729, Chesis

No.MALCU41ULBM021314, Engine No.D4FBBU977424 in the Court

as and when required to do so.

(b) the petitioner shall get the Hyundai Verna CRDI EX 1.6 bearing

No.RJ 19 CD 2729, Chesis No.MALCU41ULBM021314, Engine

(3 of 3) [CRLR-869/2021]

No.D4FBBU977424 showing the registration number as well as the

chassis number. Such photograph shall be taken in the presence of

the Investigating Officer, to be kept on the file of the case.

(c) the personal bonds of the petitioner and bonds of sureties shall

carry the photographs of the petitioner and his sureties and the

bond of sureties shall further carry the photograph of perhaps

identifying them before the Court which is with full residential

particulars of the sureties and the persons identifying them.

(d) the petitioner shall undertake not to transfer the ownership of

the Hyundai Verna CRDI EX 1.6 and not to lease it to anyone and

not to make or allow any changes in it to be made so as to make

unidentifiable.(e) the petitioner will not allow the vehicle Hyundai

Verna CRDI EX 1.6 bearing No.RJ 19 CD 2729, Chesis

No.MALCU41ULBM021314, Engine No.D4FBBU977424 to be used

for any anti social activities including for the purpose of carrying

narcotics which may constitute offence under the NDPS Act."

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

38-prashant/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter