Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6460 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12520/2021
M.d. Private Industrial Training Institute
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sobha Sharma on behalf of Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order
15/11/2021
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in
this writ petition has already been considered by a Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court in the matter of Adarsh Private Ltd. Vs. State
of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.750/2021), where
in on 07.09.2021, following order was passed:-
"In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 750/2021:
Learned counsel for the petitioners relies on the judgment passed by the Court in bunch of writ petitions with lead case of Guru Kripa Pvt. Iti versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7378/2020 to submit that those institutions which have been functioning prior to 2018 are not required to give a bank guarantee as the order cannot be treated retrospective in nature while those which have been established or which were already running from 2018 onwards are required to give bank guarantee as desired by the Government of India. The Court has further directed that no insistence will be made to pay bank guarantee for those colleges which have got interim order for the session 2018 onwards.
Learned counsel submits that on account of non-payment of bank guarantee, the
(2 of 2) [CW-12520/2021]
petitioners have been denied access to the seat matrix by not including them while the seat matrix has been opened for other institutions on 30th July, 2014. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the bank guarantee for future has to be paid and the judgment is required to be read in that aspect and wants to make further submission. He also informs that there are other cases of similar nature. Taking into consideration the grievance of the petitioners, it is directed that in the meanwhile, the petitioners shall be included in the seat matrix for the purpose of allotment of seats and its students shall not be denied merely on account of non- payment of bank guarantee.
List these cases again on 27.10.2021 along with SBCWP No. 9789/2021."
In that view of the matter, issue notice to the respondents,
returnable on 07.12.2021.
Counsel for the petitioner may supply a copy of the writ
petition in the Office of Mr. Hari Kishan Saini, Adv, and Mr. Ashish
Kumar, Adv, during the course of the day.
Office is directed to show the name of Mr. Hari Kishan Saini,
Adv, and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv, as counsel for the respondents,
in the cause list.
In the meanwhile, the petitioner(s) shall be included in the
seat matrix for the purpose of allotment of seats and its
student(s) shall not be denied merely on account of non-payment
of bank guarantee.
List along with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.750/2021 on
07.12.2021.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh /167
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!