Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manish Khichi Late Shri Chandram ... vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 6433 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6433 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Manish Khichi Late Shri Chandram ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 12 November, 2021
Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12998/2021

Manish Khichi Late Shri Chandram Khichi, Aged About 46 Years,
R/o A-191, Laxmi Narayan Puri, Near Ayurvedic Hospital, Jaipur.
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.      State    Of    Rajasthan,          Through          Principal   Secretary,
        Education Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.      Director,     Secondary          Education,         Rajasthan     Bikaner,
        Rajasthan.
3.      Joint Director, School Education, Jaipur Division Jaipur.
4.      Principal Senior Secondary School, Booj Jamwaramgarh,
        Jaipur Division Jaipur.
5.      Ram Prasad Meena, Presently Working On The Post Of
        Senior Teacher (Science) In Govt. Senior Secondary
        School, Bhinwalya, District Pali (Rajasthan)
                                                                  ----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Ganesh Sharma
For Respondent(s)          :



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Order

12/11/2021

The instant writ petition has been filed assailing the validity

and legality of the order dated 22.10.2021 passed by the

Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur (for brevity "the

learned Tribunal") whereby, the appeal preferred by him against

the order dated 14.08.2021, has been dismissed.

The facts in brief are that vide order dated 02.04.2005, the

petitioner was appointed as Teacher Grade-III and was posted at

Upper Primary School, Karkada in Tehsil Jamwaramgarh. After

(2 of 3) [CW-12998/2021]

promotion in Teacher Grade-II, vide order dated 28.10.2017, he

was posted at present place of posting i.e. Government Senior

Secondary School, Booj (Jamwaramgarh), District Jaipur. Vide

order impugned dated 14.08.2021, the petitioner was transferred

to Government Senior Secondary School, Sihali Khurd, District

Alwar and vide order dated even, the respondent No.5 was

transferred in his place. The appellant assailed the validity of the

transfer order on the premise that the same was passed to

accommodate the respondent No.5 and also on account that it was

in violation of Rule 17(1)(iv) of the Rajasthan Travelling

Allowances Rules, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules of

1971") inasmuch as no TA/DA was made payable to him under the

transfer order. Vide order impugned dated 22.10.2021, the

learned Tribunal has dismissed the appeal.

Assailing the order impugned, only contention raised by the

learned counsel for the petitioner is that while dismissing the

appeal, the learned Tribunal did not appreciate that the transfer

order was in violation of the provision of Rule 17(1)(iv) of the

Rules of 1971, as no TA/DA was made payable despite the fact

that he did not request for his transfer and hence, his appeal

deserved to be allowed.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the

record.

A perusal of the order dated 14.08.2021 assailed in the

appeal reveals that as many as 372 employees were transferred

thereunder. Clause 7 at the bottom of the transfer order reads as

under:-

"7. स्वेचच्छा सवे स ्छाान्छाानांततरंतरित क्छाारकार्मि क किक को ो यिक कोग क्छाल

ए्ानां ो य्छात्छा भतत्छा दवेो य ाननह ानां नहिक कोग्छा |"

(3 of 3) [CW-12998/2021]

By Clause 7, it was meant that whosoever is transferred on

his request, is disentitled for TA/DA and by no stretch of

imagination it can be held that all the employees under transfer

vide order dated 14.08.2021, were disentitled for payment of

TA/DA. This aspect has been appreciated by the learned Tribunal

while passing the order dated 22.10.2021. Even otherwise also,

judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Sharwan

Kumar Prajapat versus State of Rajasthan, SB Civil Writ Petition

No.7341/2020, says that an order of transfer cannot be set aside

merely because no TA/DA has been made payable even if the

transfer was not on his request, which can always be directed to

be paid.

In view thereof, this Court does not find any perversity or

illegality in the order impugned dated 22.10.2021 warranting

interference of this Court.

The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

Manish/156

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter