Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Siyaram S/O Nahar Singh Jaat vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 6348 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6348 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Siyaram S/O Nahar Singh Jaat vs State Of Rajasthan on 10 November, 2021
Bench: Manoj Kumar Vyas
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

 S. B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence App. No. 413/2021
                                       IN
               S. B. Criminal Appeal No. 633/2021

1.     Siyaram S/o Nahar Singh Jaat,
2.     Jagdish S/o Nahar Singh Jaat,
3.     Than Singh S/o Nahar Singh Jaat,
4.     Sanjay Urf Sanju S/o Siyaram,
5.     Satish Chand S/o Siyaram,
       All R/o Village Naam Police Station Nadbai District
       Bharatpur (At Present Confined At Central Jail Bharatpur)
                                                                 ----Appellants
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                ----Respondent
For Appellant(s)         :     Mr. Kapil Gupta
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, PP
                               Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar for complainant


         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
                         Order

10/11/2021

1. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.

2. The appellants have filed the appeal along with

application for suspension of sentence.

3. The appeal has been preferred against the judgments

dated 10.03.2021 and 17.03.2021 passed by court of Additional

Sessions Judge No. 4 Bharatpur (Raj.) by which the appellants

have been convicted for offence/s under Sections 148, 323, 341,

and 307 read with Section 149 of IPC and sentenced to maximum

term of seven years imprisonment.

4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the

(2 of 3) [SOSA-413/2021]

appellants that the appellants have been falsely implicated in the

matter due to enmity. Offence under Section 307 IPC is not made

out on the basis of evidence of doctors, who have prepared the

injury report and opined about the nature of injury. In this

regard, learned counsel for the appellants has referred to

statement of PW1-Dr. Sahab Singh and has submitted that when

the injury report of injured Jitendra Singh S/o Laxman was

prepared, the alleged injury was shown to be grievous in nature.

At that time, no opinion was given that this injury was dangerous

to life. It was only subsequently that on the letter of Investigating

Officer, the nature of injury was described as 'may be dangerous

to life'. The opinion is not definite and is prepared afterwards.

Similarly as far as the injury of injured Meghshyam is concerned

PW13-Dr. Sanjeev Chopra has stated in his cross examination that

after operation, injured remained in normal condition and he was

discharged in normal physical condition. The other criminal cases

shown pending against the appellants have been disposed of in

favour of the appellants. Only one other criminal case-FIR No.

656/2019 is under trial under Section 308 IPC which is also

outcome of a cross case FIR No. 657/2019 in which matter

charge-sheet has also been filed against the complainant side for

offence under Sections 456, 323, 341 IPC. It is further submitted

that as per certificate under Rule 311(3) of Rajasthan High Court

Rules, 1952, the appellants were on bail during trial and now

appellants Siyaram, Jagdish, Than Singh and Sanjay @ Sanju are

in judicial custody since 10.03.2021 and appellant-Satish Chand is

behind the bars since 17.03.2021. Hearing of the appeal may

take considerable time.

(3 of 3) [SOSA-413/2021]

5. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel

for the complainant have opposed the application for suspension

of sentence and have stated that the injuries cause to the injured

Jitendra and Meghshyam, were dangerous to life and were caused

on vital parts of the body. The evidence of prosecution is

sufficient to convict the appellants for offences for which they

have been charged.

6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the

evidence available on record.

7. Taking into consideration the submissions of learned

counsel for the parties, evidence available on record and overall

facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon

merits of the case, this Court deems just and proper to allow the

application for suspension of sentence.

8. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence

is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-

appellants 1. Siyaram S/o Nahar Singh Jaat, 2. Jagdish S/o Nahar

Singh Jaat, 3. Than Singh S/o Nahar Singh Jaat, 4. Sanjay @

Sanju S/o Siyaram and 5. Satish Chand S/o Siyaram, shall remain

suspended till disposal of this criminal appeal and they shall be

released on bail provided each of the them furnishes a personal

bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (One Lakh) and two sureties of

Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Court for their appearance in this Court on

10.12.2021 and as and when called upon to do so.

(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J

Pooja /28

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter