Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6249 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5198/2021
Indag Rubber Ltd.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan Appellate Authority
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.K. Sahu with Mr. Mudit Singhvi For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON'BLE KUMARI JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
08/11/2021
The petitioner has challenged the decision of Advance Ruling
Appellate Authority under the CGST Act both on the grounds of
procedural defeat and the decision on merits. Counsel for the
petitioner pointed out that the petitioner had filed application for
production of additional documents at the appellate stage which
was rejected by relying on Rule 112 of CGST Rules, which
according to the counsel apply to normal assessment proceedings
under the CGST Act and not for the proceedings before the
Advance Ruling Authority. He contended that these documents
were vital for a just decision on the issues and therefore should
have been taken on record by the AAR, even at the appellate
stage. On merits, Counsel relied on a Division Bench judgment of
Orissa High Court in M/s Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chief
Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax,2019 (25)
GSTL 341 (Ori.)
(2 of 2) [CW-5198/2021]
Issue notice, returnable within six weeks.
List on 20.12.2021.
(REKHA BORANA),J (AKIL KURESHI),CJ
Kamlesh Kumar/N.Gandhi/14
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!