Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prince Kumar Son Of Shri ... vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 6237 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6237 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Prince Kumar Son Of Shri ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 8 November, 2021
Bench: Prakash Gupta, Uma Shanker Vyas
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

   D.B. Cr. Misc. Bail (Suspension of Sentence) Application No.
                                  985/2021

                                       In

                D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 146/2021

Prince Kumar Son Of Shri Kamalkishore Singh, Aged About 24
Years, Resident Of House No. E-96, Gharonda Scheme, Pratap
Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In
Central Jail, Jaipur)
                                                                  ----Appellant
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P
                                                                ----Respondent

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Hora, Advocate Mr. Rajendra Yadav, AAG cum GA Mr. Javed Choudhary, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

Order

08/11/2021

This suspension of sentence application has been filed

under Section 389 CrPC.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that

sentence of co-accused Mahaveer Sharma has already been

suspended by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide its order

dated 22.9.2021 in D.B. Cr. Suspension of Sentence Application

No. 860/2021. Similarly, sentence of co-accused persons Mahesh

Kumar Meena and Ram Kishor @ R.K. has also been suspended by

the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide its order dated 24.9.2021

(2 of 3) [985 SOS 2021 in CRLAD-146/2021]

in D.B. Cr. Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No. 924/2021

in D.B. Cr. Appeal No. 129/2021 and D.B. Cr. Misc. Suspension of

Sentence Application No. 925/2021 in D.B. Cr. Appeal No.

130/2021. The case of the accused applicant is similar to those

co-accused persons whose sentence has already been suspended.

He further submits that PW-23 Ramesh Chand Sharma has not

supported the prosecution case. He further submits that the trial

court has given a finding that appellant was in constant touch with

the accused persons and there was a call detail also, but that itself

is not sufficient to prove the theory of conspiracy. He has drawn

the attention of the Court towards the statement of PW-2 Govind

Narayan Sharma, PW-19 Ram Avtar Sharma, PW-20 Sharwan,

PW-21 Narayan and submits that the accused appellant is innocent

and he has been falsely implicated in this matter. He further

submits that the accused appellant was on bail during trial, hence

his sentence should be suspended.

On the other hand, learned AAG cum GA assisted by

counsel for the complainant have opposed the same. Learned

counsel for the complainant submits that the case of the accused

appellant is distinguishable to other co-accused persons, who have

been granted bail. In support of his submissions, he has placed

reliance on the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the

case of Ramesh Bhavan Rathod Versus Vishanbhai Hirabhai

Makwana (Koli) and Another reported in (2021) 16 Supreme Court

Cases 230.

On a query from the counsel for the complainant as to

how the case of the accused appellant is distinguishable to other

co-accused persons, he has failed to give any justified reason.

Heard. Considered.

(3 of 3) [985 SOS 2021 in CRLAD-146/2021]

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of

the case and more particularly in view of the fact that sentence of

other co-accused persons, whose case is similar to the accused

appellant, has already been suspended by the Coordinate Benches

of this Court, as mentioned above, and accused appellant was on

bail during trial, we are inclined to suspend the sentence of the

accused appellant.

Accordingly, the suspension of sentence is allowed and

it is directed that the sentence awarded to the accused appellant

Prince Kumar S/o Shri Kamalkishore Singh by the trial court vide

judgment dated 7.9.2021 passed in Sessions Case no. 21/2017

shall remain suspended till disposal of the appeal, provided he

furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two

sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this

Court on 8.12.2021 and thereafter as and when called upon to do

so.

                                   (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J                                              (PRAKASH GUPTA),J

                                   DK/7









Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter