Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6231 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1306/2021
Kamlesh Kumar S/o Shri Jhuntharam,
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
----Respondent
Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1307/2021 Jitendra @ Jitu Saini S/o Rajendra Prasad, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Balaji Nagar Railway Station Fatak, Tan Mavada, R.s. District Sikar, At Present In Central Jail Sikar
----Appellant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pradeep Bochaliya for Mr. Vijay Poonia Mr. Manish Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwant Kankhadea, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
08/11/2021
IN S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1306/2021:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks an adjournment.
List after four weeks.
IN Suspension of Sentence Appl. No. 755/2021 IN S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1307/2021:-
1. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.
2. The appellant has filed the appeal along with
(2 of 3) [CRLAS-1306/2021]
application for suspension of sentence.
3. The appeal has been preferred against the judgment
dated 30.06.2021 passed by court of Special Judge, Protection of
Children From Sexual Offence Act, 2012 and child Rights
Protection Commission 2005, Sikar Raj. (trial court) in Criminal
Case No. 120/2018 (154/2017) by which the appellant has been
convicted for offence/s under Sections 366A, 342 IPC and
sentenced to maximum term of five years imprisonment.
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
appellant that appellant has been convicted under Section 366A
and 342 IPC and sentenced to maximum term of five years of
imprisonment. He has been acquitted from rest of the offences
for which he was charged under IPC and POCSO Act. Appellant is
in custody since date of arrest i.e. 20.04.2017. Out of sentence of
5 years, he has served 4 years and 7 months. Decision of the trial
may take considerable time. Application for suspension of
sentence of similarly situated co-accused-Mukendra has been
allowed by Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated
06.08.2021.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application
for suspension of sentence.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
7. Taking into consideration the submissions of learned
counsel for the parties, and overall facts and circumstances of the
case but without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court
deems just and proper to allow the application for suspension of
sentence.
(3 of 3) [CRLAS-1306/2021]
8. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence
is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-
appellant Jitendra @ Jitu Saini S/o Rajendra Prasad shall remain
suspended till disposal of this criminal appeal and he shall be
released on bail provided the appellant furnishes a personal bond
of Rs. 1,00,000/- (One lakh) and two sureties of Rs.50,000/-
(Fifty Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court
for his appearance in this Court on 08.12.2021 and as and when
called upon to do so.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Pooja /83-84
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!