Tuesday, 09, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs M/S Rajasthan Urban Drinking ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 6216 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6216 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs M/S Rajasthan Urban Drinking ... on 8 November, 2021
Bench: Akil Kureshi, Rekha Borana
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

                  D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 95/2019

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur
                                                                        ----Appellant
                                     Versus
M/s    Rajasthan       Urban        Drinking         Water          Sewerage         And
Infrastructure Corp. Ltd., Old Work Women Hostel Building, Lal
Kothi, Jaipur
                                                                     ----Respondent

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Nikhil Simlote with Mr. Salim Khan for Mr. R.B. Mathur For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON'BLE KUMARI JUSTICE REKHA BORANA

Order

08/11/2021

This appeal is filed to challenge the order passed by Income

Tax Appellate Tribunal raising following questions for our

consideration:-

"(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ITAT was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.4,77,01957/- made on account of undisclosed interest earned on FDR and not appreciating the fact that as the assessee has claimed credit of the TDS deducted on the said interest as per section 199 of the I.T. Act, such income on account of interest assessable in the hands of the assessee."

The issue pertains to the assessment year 2014-15. The

respondent-assessee-M/s Rajasthan Urban Drinking Water,

Sewerage and Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. had filed the return

of income for the said assessment year 2014-15 declaring total

income of Rs.87.61 Lacs (rounded off). The Assessing Officer

(2 of 3) [ITA-95/2019]

passed the order of assessment on 07.11.2016 assessing total

income at Rs.5.65 Crores (rounded off). During the course of

assessment, the Assessing Officer noticed that though the

assessee had claimed interest expenditure, had not offered

interest on FD's to tax. The Assessing Officer therefore made an

addition of Rs. 4.77 Crore (rounded off) as undisclosed interest

earned on FDRs. The Tribunal by the impugned judgment while

reversing the addition observed that the interest earned by the

assessee on the Fixed Deposits out of the amount received from

the Government for disbursement of the various schemes and

projects for which the assessee has nodal agency for

implementing the schemes and projects of the Government, the

interest earned on such amount is therefore not an income of the

assessee. The Tribunal noted that a similar issue was decided by

the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal and its decision was upheld

by the Karnataka High Court.

We notice that under similar circumstances and Gujarat High

Court in the case of Gujrat Power Corpn. Ltd. Vs. ITO had

made following observations:

"To our mind, the assessee was justified in contending and claiming that such interest cannot be treated as income in the hands of the assessee and that the same, therefore, cannot be taxed accordingly. When the Government of Gujarat placed such funds at the disposal of the corporation, the specific stipulation was that the same should be utilized for the purpose of allotment of shares. If for whatever reason the assessee could not immediately allot the shares, the amount which remained with the corporation, must be held to have been held by the corporation in trust for and on behalf of the State of Gujarat. If during such period when the assessee was holding such amount in trust, any interest accrued by investment of such amount in short-term deposits, such interest also must belong to the Government and till it remained in the hand of the assessee, must be treated to have been held in trust."

(3 of 3) [ITA-95/2019]

In that view of the matter, no question of law arises and the

Income Tax Appeal is dismissed.

                                   (REKHA BORANA),J                                                  (AKIL KURESHI),CJ

                                   AKG/BRIJ MOHAN GANDHI /31









Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter