Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6216 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 95/2019
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur
----Appellant
Versus
M/s Rajasthan Urban Drinking Water Sewerage And
Infrastructure Corp. Ltd., Old Work Women Hostel Building, Lal
Kothi, Jaipur
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Nikhil Simlote with Mr. Salim Khan for Mr. R.B. Mathur For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON'BLE KUMARI JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
08/11/2021
This appeal is filed to challenge the order passed by Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal raising following questions for our
consideration:-
"(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ITAT was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.4,77,01957/- made on account of undisclosed interest earned on FDR and not appreciating the fact that as the assessee has claimed credit of the TDS deducted on the said interest as per section 199 of the I.T. Act, such income on account of interest assessable in the hands of the assessee."
The issue pertains to the assessment year 2014-15. The
respondent-assessee-M/s Rajasthan Urban Drinking Water,
Sewerage and Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. had filed the return
of income for the said assessment year 2014-15 declaring total
income of Rs.87.61 Lacs (rounded off). The Assessing Officer
(2 of 3) [ITA-95/2019]
passed the order of assessment on 07.11.2016 assessing total
income at Rs.5.65 Crores (rounded off). During the course of
assessment, the Assessing Officer noticed that though the
assessee had claimed interest expenditure, had not offered
interest on FD's to tax. The Assessing Officer therefore made an
addition of Rs. 4.77 Crore (rounded off) as undisclosed interest
earned on FDRs. The Tribunal by the impugned judgment while
reversing the addition observed that the interest earned by the
assessee on the Fixed Deposits out of the amount received from
the Government for disbursement of the various schemes and
projects for which the assessee has nodal agency for
implementing the schemes and projects of the Government, the
interest earned on such amount is therefore not an income of the
assessee. The Tribunal noted that a similar issue was decided by
the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal and its decision was upheld
by the Karnataka High Court.
We notice that under similar circumstances and Gujarat High
Court in the case of Gujrat Power Corpn. Ltd. Vs. ITO had
made following observations:
"To our mind, the assessee was justified in contending and claiming that such interest cannot be treated as income in the hands of the assessee and that the same, therefore, cannot be taxed accordingly. When the Government of Gujarat placed such funds at the disposal of the corporation, the specific stipulation was that the same should be utilized for the purpose of allotment of shares. If for whatever reason the assessee could not immediately allot the shares, the amount which remained with the corporation, must be held to have been held by the corporation in trust for and on behalf of the State of Gujarat. If during such period when the assessee was holding such amount in trust, any interest accrued by investment of such amount in short-term deposits, such interest also must belong to the Government and till it remained in the hand of the assessee, must be treated to have been held in trust."
(3 of 3) [ITA-95/2019]
In that view of the matter, no question of law arises and the
Income Tax Appeal is dismissed.
(REKHA BORANA),J (AKIL KURESHI),CJ
AKG/BRIJ MOHAN GANDHI /31
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!