Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinod Punia vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 17827 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17827 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Vinod Punia vs State Of Rajasthan on 26 November, 2021
Bench: Vijay Bishnoi

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 11090/2021

Vinod Punia S/o Prema Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Desalsar, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Bikaner)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.S. Choudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Choudhary, Ms. Sampati Choudhary

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP

Mr. Manish Dadhich for complainant

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Judgment / Order

26/11/2021

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused

the material available on record.

The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR

No.254/2020 of Police Station Nokha, Distt. Bikaner for

the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 302, 307,

341, 325, 323, 427, 147, 148 and 149 IPC. He/she/they

has/have preferred this/these second bail application(s)

under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

(2 of 4) [CRLMB-11090/2021]

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

the first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed

by this Court as not pressed vide order dated 9.2.2021

while granting him liberty to file a fresh bail application

before the trial court after recording of the statements of

injured eye witnesses namely Rajendra Singh and Vikram

Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

that though the statements of the said eye witnesses

have not been recorded before the trial court, but a new

development took place in the matter, wherein, while

filing supplementary charge-sheet against some of the

accused persons, one of the IO has mentioned that the

petitioner is not found involved in the incident, therefore,

the prosection has moved an application under Section

169 Cr.P.C. before the court concerned for discharging the

petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has

submitted that in view of the fact that in the subsequent

investigation, as the petitioner is not found involved in

the commission of crime, he may be enlarged on bail.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as

learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently

opposed the bail application.

Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted

that once the charge-sheet is filed against the petitioner,

(3 of 4) [CRLMB-11090/2021]

the IO has no jurisdiction to move application under

Section 169 Cr.P.C. before the court concerned. It is

further submitted that the trial court has already

dismissed the application under Section 169 Cr.P.C.

moved on behalf of the police with a prayer for

discharging the petitioner and while taking cognizance

has already framed charges against him. It is also

submitted that in the above-referred facts and

circumstances of the case, the petitioner is not entitled to

be enlarged on bail at this stage.

Having regard to the totality of the facts and

circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact

that though earlier charge-sheet was filed against the

petitioner, but later on, in the subsequent investigation

into the incident, one of the IO has opined that the

petitioner is not involved in commission of crime, doubt

creates regarding his role in the incident, without

expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem

it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner(s) under

Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, this/these second bail application(s)

filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is/are allowed and it is

directed that petitioner(s) - Vinod Punia S/o Prema Ram

shall be released on bail in connection with FIR

(4 of 4) [CRLMB-11090/2021]

No.254/2020 of Police Station Nokha, Distt. Bikaner

provided he/she/they execute(s) a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties

of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial

court for his/her/their appearance before that court on

each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon

to do so till the completion of the trial.

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

44 - ms rathore

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter