Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Laxman vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 17811 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17811 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Laxman vs State Of Rajasthan on 26 November, 2021
Bench: Rameshwar Vyas

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 773/2021

Laxman S/o Bhawar Lal, aged about 40 years, R/o Sameliya Mahadev, Police Station Mangalvaad, District Chittorgarh.

(At present lodged in Chittorgarh Jail)

----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shreekant Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS Order

26/11/2021

The petitioner has been convicted and sentenced as below

vide Judgment dated 26.08.2021 passed by Additional Sessions

Judge No. 1, Nimbahera Camp Badi Sadari, District Chittorgarh in

Sessions Case No.3/2017 :-

Offence              Sentences              Fine                   Fine   Default
                                                                   sentences
u/s 354 IPC          1 year RI              Rs. 5,000/-            15 days SI
u/s 307 IPC          10 years RI            Rs. 25,000/-           1 month SI


The petitioner has moved this application under Section 389

Cr.P.C. seeking suspension of sentences awarded to him by the

trial court.

Learned Public Prosecutor has not chosen to file reply to the

application for suspension of sentences and proposes to argue the

matter orally.

(2 of 3) [SOSA-773/2021]

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor and perused impugned judgment and original record of

the case.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only one

injury has been caused to the victim. No repeated injury has been

inflicted by the petitioner. There is no criminal antecedents

against the petitioner. The petitioner has already served more

than 5 years and 1 month sentences awarded to him by the trial

court. The petitioner has available to him strong grounds to assail

his conviction under Section 307 IPC. The hearing of appeal will

take sufficient time. In the above circumstances, learned counsel

prays to allow this application for suspension of sentences.

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed

the application for suspension of sentences.

Having regard to the submissions made at the Bar and after

perusal of the record as also considering the facts and

circumstances of the case more particularly the fact that the

petitioner has served more than 5 years and 1 month sentences,

which is more than 50% of total sentences awarded to him by the

trial court as also number of injury sustained by the victim,

without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court is

inclined to accept the application for suspension of sentences and

to release the petitioner on bail during pendency of the appeal

subject to depositing 50% of the fine imposed by the trial court.

Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentences passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1,

Nimbahera Camp Badi Sadari, District Chittorgarh vide Judgment

dated 26.08.2021 in Sessions Case No.3/2017 against the

(3 of 3) [SOSA-773/2021]

petitioner-applicant - Laxman S/o Bhawar Lal, shall remain

suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be

released on bail subject to his depositing 50% of the fine imposed

by the trial court and provided he executes a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the trial Judge for his appearance in this Court on

20.12.2021 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the

appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the

accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused applicant does not appear before the trial court, the trial

Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of

bail.

(RAMESHWAR VYAS),J

43-Inder/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter