Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Murti Devi vs State
2021 Latest Caselaw 16751 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16751 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Murti Devi vs State on 10 November, 2021
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 439/2021

1. Murti Devi W/o Sh. Pradeep Kumar Jat, Aged About 27 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Ward No. 40, Sureshiya, Hanumangarh Junction, Dist. Hanumangarh.

2. Pradeep Kumar Jat S/o Jaswant Singh, Aged About 44 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Ward No. 40, Sureshiya, Hanumangarh Junction, Dist. Hanumangarh.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State, Through Pp

2. Superintendent Of Police, Hanumangarh.

3. The Inspector General Of Police, Bikaner Range, Bikaner.

4. S.h.o., Police Station Hanumangarh Junction, Dist.

Hanumangarh.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Bidan Halu For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Bhati, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order

10/11/2021

1. The petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. petition

under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking fair investigation in FIR

No.0349/2019 registered at Police Station Hanumangarh Junction,

District Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 370, 452,

323 and 143 of IPC.

2. In Manoj Kumaria Shankaria Vs. State of Rajasthan &

Anr., 2014(3) Raj.CriC 965, Narayan Singh Vs. State of

Rajasthan & Anr., 2013(1) Cri.L.R.264 and Aziza Begum Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Anr., 2012(1) RLW 835, wherein the

Hon'ble Apex Court has held that a fair and proper investigation is

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-439/2021]

always conducive to the ends of justice and for establishing rule of

law.

3. In Shyam Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., 2015(3)

Cri.L.R. 1375 and Gopal Nath Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.,

2015(4) Cri.L.R. 1617, relying upon the judgment of

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar V/s

State of Bihar & Anr., reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, also the

petitioner therein was permitted to submit a representation before

the investigating officer and the investigating officer was directed

to consider the documents before forming any opinion.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that fair and

transparent investigation shall be made, and in case the petitioner

submits a representation alongwith all the relevant documents

before the Superintendent of Police, Hanumangarh within a period

of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered at the

time of investigation.

5. In light of the aforesaid precedent law as well as the

assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor, the present

misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the Superintendent

of Police, Hanumangarh to consider the representation alongwith

all the relevant documents, if submitted by the petitioner within a

period of ten days from today, and conduct fair investigation,

strictly in accordance with law.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

78-payal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter