Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7919 Raj
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2021
(1 of 2) [CW-17851/2019]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17851/2019
Smt. Chanda Gwala W/o Late Shri Mahesh Gwala, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Ahir Mohalla, Ahinsa Nagar, Pratapgarh, District Pratapgarh (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To The Government, Department Of Local Self, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director And Joint Secretary, Directorate Of Local Self Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Deputy Director (Administration), Department Of Local Self Government, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. District Collector, Pratapgarh.
5. Municipal Council, Pratapgarh, District Pratapgarh Through Its Commissioner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Parihar
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
22/03/2021
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the
issue raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is
squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor
v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.1952/2019, decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied
on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors. : S.B. Civil
Writ Petition No.18056/2015, decided on 09.03.2017.
(2 of 2) [CW-17851/2019]
In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:
"In this view of the matter, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner's services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order."
Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to
dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is
covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).
In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by
the petitioner is disposed of, in light of and with similar directions
as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).
(DINESH MEHTA),J 181-A.Arora/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!