Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6801 Raj
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1152/2019
1. Mukesh Kumar S/o Prabhulal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
2. Vishnulal S/o Kevalram, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
3. Mamta W/o Mukesh Kumar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Tehsildar, Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh, Rajasthan.
3. All residents and villagers of Revenue Village Khermaliya, Through 3/1. Parmanand S/o Panna Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/2. Tori Ram S/o Pyar Chand, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/3. Geru Lal S/o Botlal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
3/4. Dayaram S/o Bhanwar Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/5. Neemat Lal S/o Shankar Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/6. Shrilal S/o Gokul, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
3/7. Radheshyam S/o Heeralal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/8. Radheshyam S/o Balmukund, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/9. Bheru Lal S/o Shankar Lal Sharma, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/10 Kailash Chandra S/o Gopilal Sharma, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
(2 of 5) [SAW-1152/2019]
3/11 Rooplal S/o Dayaram, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/12 Neel Kamal S/o Bhanwar Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/13 Suresh Chandra S/o Bihari Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/14 Rameshwar S/o Vali Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/15 Onkar Lal S/o Ram Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/16 Tulsiram S/o Bhawani Ram Namberdar, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/17 Jagdish Chandra S/o Modiram, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/18 Jagdish Chandra S/o Champalal Namberdar, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
----Respondents
Connected With
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1157/2019
1. Vishnu Lal S/o Kewal Ram, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
2. Roop Lal S/o Keshuram, aged 58 years, R/o Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh
----Appellant
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Tehsildar, Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh, Rajasthan.
3. All residents and villagers of Revenue Village Khermaliya, Through 3/1. Parmanand S/o Panna Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/2. Tori Ram S/o Pyar Chand, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil
(3 of 5) [SAW-1152/2019]
Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/3. Goru Lal S/o Botlal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
3/4. Dayaram S/o Bhanwar Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/5. Neemat Lal S/o Shankar Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/6. Shrilal S/o Gokul, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
3/7. Radheshyam S/o Heeralal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/8. Radheshyam S/o Balmukund, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/9. Bheru Lal S/o Shankar Lal Sharma, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
3/10 Kailash Chandra S/o Gopilala Sharma, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
3/11 Rooplal S/o Dayaram, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/12 Neel Kamal S/o Bhanwar Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/13 Suresh Chandra S/o Bihari Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/14 Rameshwar S/o Vali Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/15 Onkar Lal S/o Ram Lal, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/16 Tulsiram S/o Bhawani Ram Namberdar, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
3/17 Jagdish Chandra S/o Modiram, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.). 3/18 Jagdish Chandra S/o Champalal Namberdar, Resident Of Khermaliya, Tehsil Choti Sadari, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).
----Respondents
(4 of 5) [SAW-1152/2019]
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anirudh Purohit
For Respondent(s) : Mr. L.K. Purohit
Mr. Rajesh Choudhary
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Judgment
09/03/2021
These two intra court appeals have been preferred by
the appellants writ petitioners being aggrieved by the identical
orders dated 05.07.2019 and 04.07.2019 passed by the learned
Single Bench in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.9369/2019 and
9333/2019 respectively, dismissing the writ petitions preferred by
the petitioners for assailing the order dated 12.01.2017 passed by
the Board of Revenue Rajasthan dismissing the second appeals
preferred by the petitioners whereby the judgment and decree
dated 29.03.2012 passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority,
Chittorgarh was affirmed.
We have heard and considered the submissions
advanced at bar and gone through the material available on
record.
We find that by way of the subject writ petitions, the
appellant writ petitioners were seeking quashing of the orders
passed by the Revenue Courts, whereby the allotment orders
issued in favour of the petitioners for the lands in question were
set aside. It is virtually an undisputed factual position from the
material available on record that the land on which the petitioners
laid claim were entered in the Revenue records as pasture land
and thus, the same was not available for allotment. In this
(5 of 5) [SAW-1152/2019]
background, the view taken by the learned Single Bench
dismissing the writ petitions of the petitioners vide orders dated
05.07.2019 and 04.07.2019 ex facie does not suffer from any
infirmity, illegality or perversity warranting interference in the
letters patent jurisdiction of this court.
In view of the above, both the appeals fail and are
hereby dismissed as being devoid of merit.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J
41-Pramod/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!