Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6751 Raj
Judgement Date : 5 March, 2021
(1 of 3) [CMA-1701/2004]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1701/2004
Smt.Pista Devi W/o. Jhumar Lal Ji, Age-34 years, by caste Harijan, R/o. Mohalla Gawariya, Behind Railway Station, Ward No.3, Pipar City, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan
----Appellant Versus
1. Prabhu Ram S/o Shankar Lal Ji, by caste Vishnoi, R/o. Bhajan Nagar, Lohawat, Tehsil Phalodi District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
2. Om Prakash S/o Fateh Ram, R/o. Village Bhassar Kotwali, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
3. The New India Insurance Company Limited, Chopasani Road, Jodhpur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ayush Gehlot on behalf of
Mr. Rajesh Panwar
For Respondent(s) : Mr. L.D. Khatri
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Judgment
05/03/2021
The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment
and award dated 03/03/2004 passed by Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal-I, Jodhpur in Motor Accident Claims Case No. 479/2000.
Vide judgment dated 03/03/2004, the Tribunal awarded a sum of
Rs.26,100/- to the appellant on account of the injuries suffered by
her in the accident which occurred on 18/09/2000.
Learned Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the
evidence brought on record and hearing learned counsel for the
parties, decided the claim petition of the appellant as stated
hereinabove.
Heard.
(2 of 3) [CMA-1701/2004]
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Tribunal
committed an error while calculating the amount of compensation
in the present case. He submits that on account of the injuries
suffered by the appellant in the accident, she incurred permanent
disability to the extent of 9.45%. He submits that the Tribunal has
not adequately compensated the appellant and, therefore, the
amount is required to be reassessed in the light of the RSLSA
Guidelines issued on 05/11/2018.
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent/Insurance
Company submits that the Tribunal has taken into consideration
the entire evidence produced before it while computing the award
in the present case and has rightly awarded a 'just compensation'
to the appellant on account of the injuries suffered by her in the
accident. However, learned counsel is unable to controvert the
submissions of learned counsel for the appellant for recalculation
of the amount in accordance with the RSRLA Guidelines.
For the purpose, both the learned counsel for the parties
have produced a joint calculation of the compensation in the
present case in accordance with the RSRLA Guidelines which is as
under :-
Age of the Injured : 30 Years
Injuries : Fracture (Leg) - Rs.15,000/-
grievous injury
Permanent Disability : 9.45%
25000+3000X9.45 = Rs.53,350/-
Hospitalization : 4 days X 600 = Rs. 2,400/-
Loss of Income : 25%(72,750) = Rs. 18,188/-
Medical Expenses & : = Rs. 2,000/-
Nourishment
Total Award : Rs.92,938/-
(3 of 3) [CMA-1701/2004]
Less : Award by Tribunal : Rs.26,100/-
Enhanced award : Rs.66,838/-
In view of the discussions made above, the present appeal is
partly allowed. The amount of Rs.66,838/- (Rupees : Sixty Six
Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty Eight Only) is enhanced in the
present case. The respondent/Insurance Company is directed to
pay an amount of Rs.66,838/- in addition to the amount already
awarded by the Tribunal within a period of six weeks from today.
The enhanced amount shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum
from the date of filing the claim petition till the same is actually
paid.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
211-SanjayS/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!