Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2120 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
2000/2021
1. Ghanshyam S/o Shri Kishan Lal, R/o Khedki Veerbhan
Tehsil Kotputli Dist. Jaipur Raj.
2. Lalit S/o Shri Kishan Lal, R/o Khedki Veerbhan Tehsil
Kotputli Dist. Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Agarwal
Mr. Hoshiyar Singh Arya
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Bhadu, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
04/03/2021
1. Petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 438
of Cr.P.C.
2. F.I.R. No.476/2020 was registered at Police Station, Kotputli,
District Jaipur for offence under Sections 354 I.P.C.
3. It is contended by the counsel for the petitioners that prior to
lodging of the present F.I.R., a complaint was filed to the police
that complainant-party intended to level false allegations against
the petitioners. Parties were bound down under Section 107 &
116(3) of Cr.P.C.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor contends that notice under Section
41-A of Cr.P.C. has been given to the petitioners. They are co-
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-2000/2021]
operating with the investigation and custodial interrogation is not
required.
5. I have considered the contentions.
6. Considering the contention put forth by counsel for the
petitioners, the anticipatory bail application is allowed.
7. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The
S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Kotputli District Jaipur in F.I.R.
No. 476/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners they
shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a
personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only)
together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty
Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following
conditions:-
(I). that the petitioners shall make themselves available for
interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii). that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts
to the Court or any police officer, and
(iii). that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous
permission of the Court.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
ARTI SHARMA /64
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!