Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2114 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
1813/2021
Paramjeet Singh S/o Govind Singh Rajput, R/o Gaadli Tehsil
Buhana Dist. Jhunjhunu Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hem Singh Rathore with Ms. Seema Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Bhadu, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
04/03/2021
1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 438 of
Cr.P.C.
2. F.I.R. No.0143/2020 was registered at Police Station, Buhana
District Jhunjhunu for offence under Sections 8 & 20 of NDPS Act.
3. It is contended by the counsel for the petitioner that the
contraband was not recovered from the petitioner. Petitioner is
neither the seller nor was the contraband meant for selling to the
petitioner. It is also contended that the matter has been kept
pending under Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C. against the petitioner,
only on the ground that he told the co-accused that he would
receive money, if he dealt in contraband. It is further contended
that petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents of like
nature.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-1813/2021]
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
5. I have considered the contentions.
6. Considering the contention put forth by counsel for the
petitioner, the anticipatory bail application is allowed.
7. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The
S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Buhana District Jhunjhunu in
F.I.R. No. 0143/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner
he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond
in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with
two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand
only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:-
(I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for
interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts
to the Court or any police officer, and
(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous
permission of the Court.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
ARTI SHARMA /62
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!