Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9808 Raj
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2021
(1 of 2) [CRLR-291/2021]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 291/2021
Pema Ram S/o Chetan Ram, Aged About 49 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Village Chutaraniyo Ki Dhani, Tehsil Baytu, Barmer.
----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Parbha Choudhary, on VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI (VACATION JUDGE)
Order
22/06/2021
In the wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, the
Court is functioning virtually and abundant caution is being
maintained for the safety of all concerned.
The petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. petition
praying that the order dated 01.03.2021 passed by learned
Special Court, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act Cases), Barmer
in Sessions Case NO.337/2017 (103/17), be set aside, whereby
the said Court refused to release the vehicle Diesel Tankers
bearing registration No.RJ-39-GA-2199 to the petitioner. The said
vehicle was seized in connection with CR No.191/2017 registered
at P.S. Sadar, Barmer for the offence under Section 407, 420 &
120-B of IPC and Section 3/7 of Essential Commodities Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated at Bar that
no confiscation proceedings are pending qua the vehicle in
(2 of 2) [CRLR-291/2021]
question and the same is case property. The learned counsel for
the petitioner has relied upon Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs.
State of Gujarat, (2002) 10 SCC 283, to contend that the
Supreme court has held that the vehicle should not be permitted
to remain parked in the police station as same shall gather rust
and shall not remain useful.
Learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to
refute the above position.
Relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case
of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai (supra), the present misc. petition is
allowed and the trial court is directed to release the vehicle Diesel
Tankers bearing registration No.RJ-39-GA-2199 on supardaginama
in favour of petitioner on usual conditions, which the trial court
deems fit, provided he furnishes a bank guarantee of
Rs.5,00,000/- with the trial court.
Needless to say, trial court shall make verification that the
petitioner is a registered owner of the vehicle.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),VJ.
61-/Sanjay/Jitender//-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!