Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2696 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR.
...
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14989/2020.
(Second Bail)
Mangi Lal Son of Shri Jaluram, Resident of Bhangarh, Tehsil
Nawa District Nagaur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
07/07/2021
This second anticipatory bail application has been filed by the
petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.
1/2018, Police Station Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur, registered for
the offences under Sections 376(1) & 506 of the Indian Penal
Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that earlier S.B.
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 7812/2019 titled as "Mangilal
Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr." has been filed and in that Petition,
a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.12.2019 has
converted the non-bailable warrant issued against the accused-
petitioner into bailable warrant. Learned counsel also stated that
since the original case is still pending before the Magistrate Court
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-14989/2020]
and the Court concerned is not ready to accept the bail bonds
furnished by the accused-petitioner in compliance of the order of
this Court dated 16.12.2019, therefore, direction may be issued to
the Trial Court concerned to accept the bail bonds furnished by the
accused-petitioner in compliance of the order dated 16.12.2019
passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. In support of his
contentions, learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to and
relied upon the following judgments passed by this Court:-
(1) Bhagchand & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal
Revision No. 1047/2018, decided on 30.07.2018);
(2) Bhudev Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal Misc.
(Petition) No. 7524/2019, decided on 02.12.2019);and,
(3) Bheem Raj Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. (S.B. Criminal
Misc. Application No. 193/2019, decided on 31.05.2019).
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer
now made on behalf of the accused-petitioner.
Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and learned
Public Prosecutor.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and
upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar and
the order placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner for the
Court's perusal, the prayer regarding issuance of the requisite
directions to the concerned Trial Court is accepted. Although,
further considering the entire facts, circumstances and allegations
involved in this case, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit
case for grant of anticipatory bail in favour of the accused-
petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-14989/2020]
However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
case and in the interest of justice, the Trial Court concerned is
directed that if the accused-petitioner furnished bail bonds in
compliance of this Court's earlier order dated 16.12.2019 passed
in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.7812/2019 within a period of
seven (07) days, the Trial Court concerned shall release the
accused-petitioner, only after verifying the bail bonds.
With the observations foregoing, this second anticipatory bail
application preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the
accused-petitioner - Mangi Lal S/o Jaluram is disposed of.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J
40-Mohan/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!