Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sumitra vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 11300 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11300 Raj
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Sumitra vs State Of Rajasthan on 22 July, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8094/2021

Sumitra D/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 31 Years, Dabli Badi, Post Jhadsar Khadhlan, Tehsil Taranagar, District Churu.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bikaner.

4. Bikaner Medical Relief Society, Bikaner, C/o Mrs. Laxmi Kanwar, Opp. Lalgarh Railway Station, Subhashpura, Bikaner Through Its Chairman.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanuman Singh Choudhary

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

22/07/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

would feel satisfied if a direction be issued to the respondent to

consider her representation in the light of judgment dated

20.03.2017 rendered by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions led

by SB Civil Writ Petition No.953/2017 (Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay &

Ors. Vs.State of Rajasthan & Ors.).

2. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed

of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation

ventilating the above referred grievance and other grievances (if

any) within a period of four weeks from today.

(2 of 2) [CW-8094/2021]

3. In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid

period, the respondents shall consider and decide the same in

accordance with law including the law laid down by this Court in

the case of Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay (supra); however, in no case

later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.

4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not

be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 68-Ramesh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter