Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gautam vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 10698 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10698 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Gautam vs State Of Rajasthan on 13 July, 2021
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
           S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 415/2021

Gautam S/o Hakru Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ghatiya,
P.s. Salamgarh, Dist. Pratapgarh. (Presently Lodged In Central
Jail, Udaipur).
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                  ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Vijay Kumar Gaur
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                      Order

13/07/2021

     In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant

caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court,

for the safety of all concerned.

     Admit.
     Issue notice.


     Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the

State. Hence, notice need not be issued.


     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Public Prosecutor on S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Revision)

No138/2021.


     The    custody      certificate        furnished        by   learned   Public

Prosecutor is taken on record.


     I have considered the rival arguments advanced by the


                      (Downloaded on 13/07/2021 at 08:57:59 PM)
                                           (2 of 3)                [CRLR-415/2021]


parties and perused the judgments of the courts below. Looking

to the facts and circumstances of the case and the short sentence

awarded by the learned trial court, I consider it just and proper to

suspend the sentence awarded to the accused petitioner.


     Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Revision)

No138/2021 filed under Section 397 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Additional Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Arnod, District Pratapgarh in Cr. Regular Case

No.363/2017 vide order dated 17.08.2017 as affirmed by the

learned District and Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh vide order dated

31.03.2021 in Cr. Appeal No.67/2017 against the petitioner

Gautam S/o Hakru Meena, shall remain suspended till final

disposal of the aforesaid revision and he shall be released on bail,

provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-

with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 16.08.2021

and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the revision on

the conditions indicated below:-


     1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the

           month of January of every year till the revision is

           decided.


     2.    That if the petitioner changes the place of

           residence, he will give in writing his changed

           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

           in the High Court.


     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

           they will give in writing their changed address to
                      (Downloaded on 13/07/2021 at 08:57:59 PM)
                                                                                (3 of 3)                [CRLR-415/2021]


                                              the trial Court.


                                        The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-petitioner in a separate file. Such file be registered as

                                   Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

                                   petitioner was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

                                   be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused-petitioner does not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.

                                                                     (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

45-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter