Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10587 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2701/2021
Kishan Lal S/o Shri Ganesh Lal Khatik, Aged About 36 Years,
Pari, Police Station Bhopalsagar, Presently Residing At Kamlod,
Debari, Tehsil Mawli, District Udaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sangram Singh
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
12/07/2021
1. In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant
caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court,
for the safety of all concerned.
2. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has
been preferred against the order dated 22.04.2021 passed by
learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mawli, District
Udaipur, wherey the learned Magistrate has rejected the
application of the petitioner under Sections 451 & 457 Cr.P.C. for
releasing the vehicle i.e. Maruti Alto Car No.RJ 12 CA 0350 on
superdaginama.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated at Bar that no
confiscation proceedings are pending qua the Maruti Alto Car
No.RJ 12 CA 0350 and the same is case property of case FIR
No.67/2021 registered at Police Station Dabok, District Udaipur.
(Downloaded on 12/07/2021 at 08:53:35 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-2701/2021]
4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, (2002) 10
SCC 283, to contend that the Supreme Court has held that the
vehicle should not be permitted to remain parked in the police
station as same shall gather rust and shall not remain useful.
6. Relying upon the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai (supra), the present petition is
allowed and the trial court is directed to release Maruti Alto Car
bearing registration No.RJ 12 CA 0350 seized as case property by
imposing following conditions:-
a) That the petitioner shall keep the vehicle so released
intact and shall not change its identification.
b) That the petitioner shall produce the vehicle as and when
trial court requires the same for proposed identification of
the case property.
c) That the petitioner shall execute Supurdaginama/
indemnity bond and bonds by two sureties to the satisfaction
of the trial court.
(d) The trial court is empowered to impose any or other
conditions in the Supurdaginama/indemnity bond and surety
bonds to be furnished by the petitioner and sureties, which it
may deem fit.
7. Needless to say, trial court shall make verification that the
petitioner is a registered owner of the vehicle.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
34-SKant/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!